Bankie
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 2,469
Everything depends on game settings.
Yes.
They say it requires some optical sensor of some sort; it doesn't surprise me that new tech requires new hardware. Yet, my old ass 2080ti can use DLSS 2 which is better than any current (and probably future) version of FSR. My old ass card can use DLSS AND FSR while AMD is stuck on FSR on cards that are even older; it's not like anyone is choosing to use FSR over DLSS...Could the RTX 20 and 30 series do DLSS 3.0? Most likely yes, but Nvidia is locking older gen products out of it. DLSS is superior but it's also superior at fragmenting users out of tech that could be done on any GPU. FSR works on all cards, including yours and even older cards like mine.
Yes but the 7X00 series is even closer to the 6X00 series than that so why does it matter?He also said it's also basically nothing over Pascal. It's also closer to 35% faster at 4k, which is still basically nothing.
For most people 33% isn't enough to justify hundreds or in your case thousands of dollars, hence the poor GPU sales. If I'm gaming at 40fps and buy a GPU that's 33% faster, then I'm running it at 60fps, for what is hundreds of dollars. For that kind of increase I'm better off waiting for a proper upgrade. For me to get a proper upgrade I would have to buy a 6700 XT, which are cheap but at best it offers double the frame rate of my Vega 56 for what is now $350 new and under $300 used on Ebay. If I'm more patient, I wouldn't be surprised if Jedi Survivor's poor frame rate is attributed to Denuvo. Remember that whole fiasco with Resident Evil 8 and DRM killing performance? Wouldn't shock me if new games are terrible just because of the new Denuvo. Most of these new games haven't been cracked yet, so who knows what performance killing effects Denuvo has on these games?