- Joined
- May 18, 1997
- Messages
- 55,634
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meh, not worth ~50% higher price than the 6800XT. 3090 price is crazy high, but at least you get extra VRAM for it. AMD is 10% more performance for $350 more lol.looks good for the price point
compared to Nvidia price it is good... besides we know drivers get better with each release so I would not be worried.Meh, not worth ~50% higher price than the 6800XT. 3090 price is crazy high, but at least you get extra VRAM for it. AMD is 10% more performance for $350 more lol.
Uh.. Ok.What I am predicting:
Spoiler: at xmas, AMD will release a xmas gift that will destroy Nvidia (ray tracing benchmarks)
So keep up the great work AMD!
Got mine first try this morning.I haven't even kept up.
Is it "available" now?
I thought I was good got all the way through paypal checkout and then it dumped me when it went back to amd page.Got mine first try this morning.
View attachment 306864
Got mine first try this morning.
View attachment 306864
Comparable performance & faster in some cases than the 3090 at $500 dollars cheaper. I'd say AMD has a winner.
Well, I thought I was. Dude, imagine my surprise when it went through. I knew for sure I was getting a cancellation email. But it all worked out. I was going to give it to my son, but I think I have changed my mind now.Thought you were waiting until Q2?
Well, I thought I was. Dude, imagine my surprise when it went through. I knew for sure I was getting a cancellation email. But it all worked out. I was going to give it to my son, but I think I have changed my mind now.
lol, people poopood the 6800 for being $70 more than the 3070. At least the extra 8 gigs of memory on the 6800 didn't come with a $500 premium.Meh, not worth ~50% higher price than the 6800XT. 3090 price is crazy high, but at least you get extra VRAM for it. AMD is 10% more performance for $350 more lol.
Meh, not worth ~50% higher price than the 6800XT. 3090 price is crazy high, but at least you get extra VRAM for it. AMD is 10% more performance for $350 more lol.
Non sure many would agree, how does the 6900xt look good for the price point when compared to the 6800xt or even the 3800 ?looks good for the price point
yeah cause we all know that performance does not improve with drivers and in some cases it is faster than NVIDIA at 1500 bux...Non sure many would agree, how does the 6900xt look good for the price point when compared to the 6800xt or even the 3800 ?
Touching first on the raw performance of this graphics card, the extra core count means the 6900 XT is, on average, 7% faster than the 6800 XT at 1440p, and 9% faster at 4K
Compared to the RTX 3080, the 6900 XT is 5% faster at 1440p, and 2% faster on average at 4K
The 3080 is 25% cheaper per frame.
The only way possible way for it to look good would be to compare it to an absolutely ridiculous card to use for gaming like a 3090 (but you cannot use the worst price point has a comparable to judge that something look good)
Yeah, I am watching GN's review and the boost over the 6800 XT seems really marginal for the price jump. Same amount of VRAM...doesn't seem like a good value. The 3090 was never a good value even when it was the only card to consider at the top end for VRAM.Meh, not worth ~50% higher price than the 6800XT. 3090 price is crazy high, but at least you get extra VRAM for it. AMD is 10% more performance for $350 more lol.
I feel sorry for anyone who bought a 3090 for non-prosumer uses.
yeah cause we all know that performance does not improve with drivers and in some cases it is faster than NVIDIA at 1500 bux...
View attachment 306886
Would you disagree that the NVIDIA at 1,500 is by far the worst looking performance in game for the price offering right now (in competition to be in all time), why choose has a point of comparison that absolute worst FPS/$ by a large margin and then conclude it look good from that ?yeah cause we all know that performance does not improve with drivers and in some cases it is faster than NVIDIA at 1500 bux...
I suspect they will nicely over time (at least for some title, maybe less for the Dirt 5 of the world), but considering how similar the 6800xt is, why would it improve significantly more on the 6900xt than on the 6800xt ? And with the same VRram it is hard to imagine the difference to growth over time on that aspect.yeah cause we all know that performance does not improve with drivers
If you spend $1500 on a video card with roughly 10% performance over a $700 option, I will never feel sorry for you. Then again, anyone dumping that kind of money on a marginal performance gain probably doesn’t care either.
TPU's results have been VERY suspect when I look at the review scene as a whole. In no way would I rely on its testing and review results. It is surely the "one man out" when compared to many others.View attachment 306889
Average of 22 games @ 4K from the same source. 6900 XT is only 2% faster than the 3080. And only within 1% at 1080p and 1440p.
You can hope for performance to improve at a greater rate on AMD than Nvidia (historically they typically are), but there is no guarantee on that.
This it is a bit like feeling sorry for someone that just bought new fancy tire's for their porsche and a new better model just got out.If you spend $1500 on a video card with roughly 10% performance over a $700 option, I will never feel sorry for you. Then again, anyone dumping that kind of money on a marginal performance gain probably doesn’t care either.
View attachment 306889
Average of 22 games @ 4K from the same source. 6900 XT is only 2% faster than the 3080. And only within 1% at 1080p and 1440p.
You can hope for performance to improve at a greater rate on AMD than Nvidia (historically they typically are), but there is no guarantee on that.
Did you read his entire post? It was 2% at 4K lol.If you are buying a 6900 xt for 1080p (and maybe even 1440p) you are doing it wrong.
Not when you get RT involved.compared to Nvidia price it is good... besides we know drivers get better with each release so I would not be worried.
Only used TPU as it was the same source as the person I was quoting used.TPU's results have been VERY suspect when I look at the review scene as a whole. In no way would I rely on its testing and review results. It is surely the "one man out" when compared to many others.