staknhalo
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,924
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
true and old.Is this old news or true ?
https://inf.news/en/digital/9d4ac775ba2f77daf3f0ad255bb233f5.html
Guessing not true.
It's an OS that was released last week, and Microsoft and AMD have already committed to fixing it by next week. That's actually lightning-fast for most companies, and if anything, evidence that they are both taking this quite seriously. In the meantime, I'm still not seeing any major slowdowns on my 5900X even after updating to 22000.258, so I won't be crying myself to sleep at night because I have to wait one week for the patch.
Although it does make me wonder how much the performance impact varies from CPU to CPU. Obviously the L3 cache issue affects all Ryzen CPUs, but as far as not selecting the preferred core(s) goes, it seems only logical to assume that this would have a bigger impact on CPUs that have a bigger variance between their best and worst cores. My 5900X does not seem to have as big of a variation between cores as I've seen others have.
That was not the point, someone asked and I answered if it was confirmed.
you can install on those systems from an ISO but not from their media creation tool and not from windows update. Also they have a pretty solid disclaimer that they make no promises about stability, performance, nor security when running Windows 11 on that hardware.Is this old news or true ?
https://inf.news/en/digital/9d4ac775ba2f77daf3f0ad255bb233f5.html
Guessing not true.
Do they make such promises on their official install? haha sorry just had toyou can install on those systems from an ISO but not from their media creation tool and not from windows update. Also they have a pretty solid disclaimer that they make no promises about stability, performance, nor security when running Windows 11 on that hardware.
Intel is better Jim Keller's design dated design just doesn't work.
It's an OS that was released last week, and Microsoft and AMD have already committed to fixing it by next week. That's actually lightning-fast for most companies, and if anything, evidence that they are both taking this quite seriously. In the meantime, I'm still not seeing any major slowdowns on my 5900X even after updating to 22000.258, so I won't be crying myself to sleep at night because I have to wait one week for the patch.
Although it does make me wonder how much the performance impact varies from CPU to CPU. Obviously the L3 cache issue affects all Ryzen CPUs, but as far as not selecting the preferred core(s) goes, it seems only logical to assume that this would have a bigger impact on CPUs that have a bigger variance between their best and worst cores. My 5900X does not seem to have as big of a variation between cores as I've seen others have.
No, we Insiders did. This issue has been reported in the Feedback Hub for at least 2 months now. But like many things that get reported in the Feedback Hub, we got no real updates on the situation. I honestly wonder why they even have the Feedback Hub because it seems they don't really look at anything in it.The hurt is real! I really can’t even game on my system right now. In fortnite for example I’ll be running 165fps (the limit I have set in the options) and it will drop to 60fps. This happens every few seconds regardless of what quality settings I have set. I installed the latest update before I saw it make performance worse. I’m not sure how ms and amd didn’t know about this months ago. No one tested games on windows 11 before launch?
https://hardforum.com/threads/win-11-l3-aida64.2014506/#post-1045163696
Oh come on, they look at everything in the Hub before ignoring it.I honestly wonder why they even have the Feedback Hub because it seems they don't really look at anything in it.
yes, but shouldnt amd have done some internal testing on this? this should be all up to the insiders to find.
Why would anyone install a beta version of Windows without waiting for at least a year of patches? This should be common sense by now, then again I am old enough to have used every version of Windows since 3.0.
Why would anyone install a beta version of Windows without waiting for at least a year of patches? This should be common sense by now, then again I am old enough to have used every version of Windows since 3.0.
Why would anyone install a beta version of Windows without waiting for at least a year of patches?
I beta tested every early Windows release through 3.11 for Workgroups and the inital version of NT. I kinda miss getting boxes of 3.5" floppies from MS. Ahh, the good old days., then again I am old enough to have used every version of Windows since 3.0.
I beta tested every early Windows release through 3.11 for Workgroups and the inital version of NT. I kinda miss getting boxes of 3.5" floppies from MS. Ahh, the good old days.
Whoa there friend. Never disparage AMD, especially on these forums. Remember that AMD is here to save us from big bad Intel and tyrannous Nvidia.yes, but shouldnt amd have done some internal testing on this? this should be all up to the insiders to find.
See, this guy gets it.Stop.
First, let's see if there's some way we can blame this on Intel first, then Nvidia. Then Microsoft. Then you. Nothing is ever AMDs fault, especially when it comes to AMD products.
Crazy thing is CHKDSK finishes faster on my 2TB WD850 then it did on a 1.44MB 3.5" floppy.Right. Or when disk 7 wouldn't read.
Why, because they had an issue and it was quickly fixed?This is why I am sticking with Windows 10 on one machine and Ubuntu 20.04 on all 3 of my computers.
Why, because they had an issue and it was quickly fixed?
negative, it's always been chkdsk.com and .exeIt was called Disk Check at that time.
I'm pretty sure Windows 11 is Frankenstein code that is really running on DOS.Because every new version of Windows is always worse. With the exception of Windows 2000.