Here are some more benchmarks. One which I think reflect the numbers better than some other sites:
http://techreport.com/etc/2004q3/source-engine/index.x?pg=1
http://techreport.com/etc/2004q3/source-engine/index.x?pg=1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
obs said:Here are some more benchmarks. One which I think reflect the numbers better than some other sites:
http://techreport.com/etc/2004q3/source-engine/index.x?pg=1
The XT PE still outperforms everything. DH is so ridiculously biased. Besides, it's not like I am posting some crap from Toms or something. Hell, they were even using the 61 version drivers.fallguy said:Of course you do, NV is closer in this one.
We're talking CS players hereAH786 said:ye 9800 pro only better in super low res, as if any1 will run it at 640 by 480.
AH786 said:ye 9800 pro only better in super low res, as if any1 will run it at 640 by 480.
obs said:The XT PE still outperforms everything. DH is so ridiculously biased. Besides, it's not like I am posting some crap from Toms or something. Hell, they were even using the 61 version drivers.
Netrat33 said:*laughing* yea I'll admit it: What's wrong with Tom's hardware guide?
I remember hearing something long time ago, but was getting out of the whole computer gaming and going console for a while *I go in waves*
gordon151 said:I think fallguy is refering to the firingsquad and vr-zone benchies which show the xt out by a lot more. I noticed those dont get posted a lot myself.
Partly bias towards certain cards at different times and B7 for a long time because of Tom's rant after 9/11.THE JEW (RaVeN) said:Perceived bias due to $ kickbacks and some claim that their results cannot be replicated. Also, there was some sort of falling out between [H] and Tom's, but I don't know why. I'm not 0ld sk00l enough.......or something like that.
y is he selling it that cheap? i want one!Circuitbreaker8 said:Hm...lol I plan to play at 1280x1024 unless I get a 6800gt by then. My freind is selling me his for 250$+a HDD
obs said:We're talking CS players here
What huge thread? He's referring to the new vr-zone HL2 VST benchmarks, not the CS:S timedemo ones. I can't find any threads other than this one: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=796720rancor said:There was a huge thread about those here....
Yes, I know. The VR-Zone benchmarks and the Tech Report benchmarks are both using the HL2 VST.Killdozer said:Just so you know...there's a fucking huge difference between CS: Source and the VST...that's why the numbers were different. And there's still a difference between CS: Source and actual HL2
Blad3 said:So both cards do excellent, that's at full detail too.
Visable-assassin said:hey I play at 1024x768 in pretty much every game I play....the only ones I can htink of off hand that play at stupidly low resolutions are those who seem to think it makes the players on screen "bigger" or the CAL players
rancor said:much closer to what everyone else has been benching too
trilobyte said:Well from Tech-Report benches, IMO, nvidia is still the one to get this generation. a 6800GT will spank ati in doom3, and has identical performance in HL2 with the x800 Pro. Not to mention PS3.0 support for games coming down the pipe later
GoatMan said:It's called a preference. Some people enjoy 1600x1200 while i do not... it's all in a matter of what you like... Just because somebody plays in something you don't like doesn't make them stupid.
note: i generally play all games in 1024x768... tho doom 3 at 1600x1200 isn't to bad.
Spank said:its' not at full detail, they are using reflect world instead of reflect all, i would say that this is one of the reasons for the different bench results depending on what site you look at
I understand that Doom3 don't matter to you anymore but the Doom3 engine is going to be used in quite a few games so to just disregard it doesn't do it justice. Hell, I personally can't wait to give Doom3 Fortress a try. They are apparantly reworking a lot to allow the game to play well with 16 players (not the max). Besides, good multiplayer games usually aren't very good just after release (CS, Q3, etc). It generally take some patching and modding.fallguy said:As for Doom3, I dont care about it anymore. Beat it, and the multiplayer stinks, to me. 8 players, and 5 maps is not the recipe for a long lasting multiplayer game. Again, in my opinion. Same as Farcry, beat it twice, and the multiplayer is very unbalanced, with many issues. Untill a total conversion, or another game with the engines comes out, they dont matter to me anymore.
yes it does seem to happen a lotOldPueblo said:Whats with all the editing here?
fallguy said:I lost 6 frames with 4xAA/8xAF, and 11 frames with NoAA, and Trilinear. Versus when it was reflect world. It seems to take about a 10% performance hit.
Mojo said:I don't believe any of these shit-marks. I'll wait until OCP, Anandtech, or Xbit come out with benchmarks. Then judge the cards from their offerings. Might as well trust a reliable source.
Spank said:what card is that with? 6800 drops around 15%
fallguy said:BFG6800 GT.
sativa said:i got banned from driverheaven.net for linking to techreports article
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=111686&poll_id=0&warned=y
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=111690&poll_id=0&warned=y
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=111692&poll_id=0&warned=y
sativa said:hey i emailed the admin and asked why i was banned... here's the response i got
I would class "you guys must have used a GT" as quite incorrect.
anyway its not open for discussion, we have had 100 1 post users just
posting crap all over the forums many with the same IP. ive no
patience left to deal with it.
have a nice weekend.
--
Kind Regards,
Allan "Zardon" Campbell
www.driverheaven.net site owner.
funny how i'm responsible for other newly registered members. I only registered one account at DH.
Also funny because i didn't say "you must have used a GT."
look at my above screenshots to see the post that got me banned.
it's not new for boards to ban people for pointing out mistakes.sativa said:oh yeah and here's a screenshot of his email to me
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=111711