Comixbooks
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 22,042
OOS on LGs site can't say the same for OLED TVs which are almost the same price.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes and no.At 240Hz on OLED is there advantage in running BFI at 120Hz instead? Presumably if you can't hit 240 then you may as well. Can this do BFI@120 given the lack of support on the more recent lg tv's?
At 240Hz on OLED is there advantage in running BFI at 120Hz instead? Presumably if you can't hit 240 then you may as well. Can this do BFI@120 given the lack of support on the more recent lg tv's?
I'm pressing hard for BFI eventually in OLED, but it won't be in this first generation of 240Hz OLEDs at this time.No OLED monitor is capable of any BFI as far as I know, and the last TV that could do it at 120Hz was the LG C1 which is probably impossible to find brand new by now. Sucks because I feel like OLED was the perfect tech to pair with BFI.
That's putting it mildly....slightly
Even though Dough has a slightly tarnished reputation right now. But you might want to look at their glossy version of this display.
https://www.dough.tech/pages/spectrum-glossy-oled-qhd-240hz-monitor
I don't know anything about these guys, whats the deal?
A BFI-capable OLED monitor that goes down to 60hz single strobe is an instant buy for me. Especially if it allows for the pulse width tweaking ala Viewsonic XG2431.I'm pressing hard for BFI eventually in OLED, but it won't be in this first generation of 240Hz OLEDs at this time.
That being said -- long term, strobeless blur reduction will be the way to go. BFI will be mainly useful only for framerate-limited content (retro content, video content), when all PC games implement this technology. An RTX 4090 can now do 4K 1000fps 1000Hz with that new reprojection software technology, ported from VR. Doing 1ms MPRT ergonomically strobelessly with the same motion clarity as strobing is now within the window of this decade's technology -- at least for PC gaming.
LG store?I ordered one today it should arrive Wednesday. Hopefully going from 4K 27" to 1440P 27" doesn't bother me too much.
Yeah. I really hope they bring BFI back.A BFI-capable OLED monitor that goes down to 60hz single strobe is an instant buy for me. Especially if it allows for the pulse width tweaking ala Viewsonic XG2431.
Why just 27? I'm on 27 acer g sync 165hz ips panel and looking to go up on size but stick with 1440p. What would be a noticeable huge upgrade for me? I'm running a 3070tiI might wait around for the 27" ASUS Swift version which uses the same OLED panel but the adjustments might be better but maybe not.
So what exactly is the benefits/advantages of MLA, isn't it supposed to enchant WRGB-OLED to be as good as/surpass QD-OLED ?These are no way MLA. LG is just straight up lying.
We can never go wrong with HDR when it comes to OLED.HDR image can disappear like that completely..
Windows HDR Calibration only makes sure there is no highlight clipping, no lowlight blackcrush. It compresses the image within the range of the display so highlight has outlines while lowlight has silhouette.
Why just 27? I'm on 27 acer g sync 165hz ips panel and looking to go up on size but stick with 1440p. What would be a noticeable huge upgrade for me? I'm running a 3070ti
Why just 27? I'm on 27 acer g sync 165hz ips panel and looking to go up on size but stick with 1440p. What would be a noticeable huge upgrade for me? I'm running a 3070ti
It's just a setting to match the level of low brightness. It makes sure black level isn't lifted. It doesn't do anything about high brightness though. FALD make that image disappear as well.We can never go wrong with HDR when it comes to OLED.
Good point I'm in the same boat.. Although I go for ips panels for better colors.I don't know if I'll like the bigger sizes I would go all out and buy that perfect Dell Alienware 34" but I like tight FOV monitors for faster reaction times.
I'll be super curious what the ASUS using this panel will have to offer too.I might wait around for the 27" ASUS Swift version which uses the same OLED panel but the adjustments might be better but maybe not.
So what exactly is the benefits/advantages of MLA, isn't it supposed to enchant WRGB-OLED to be as good as/surpass QD-OLED ?
Last month folks on AVS were saying at worst MLA would make WRGB rival TCL/JOLED's RGB-OLED.
Why just 27? I'm on 27 acer g sync 165hz ips panel and looking to go up on size but stick with 1440p. What would be a noticeable huge upgrade for me? I'm running a 3070ti
sRGB is fairly accurate at high brightness, loses it's accuracy around 140 Nits and below. Gamer 1 was the one that shocked me with how bad it was because of how blue it is at default. I did manually calibrate it to make it more accurate so I have a color accurate native profile.
Incase you were curious, I did the following to correct Gamer 1 (at 150 Nits):
Energy Savings: Off
Brightness 70
Red 50
Green 49
Blue 42
Contrast 70
Gamma Mode 1
I'll probably manually calibrate Gamer 2 at 180 or 190 Nits this weekend.
Even if half of that could be achieved in next few years, or even quarter of it on consoles it would be the best thing ever. Do you think the industry as a whole will go that way (pc and consoles to an extent)? I'm talking about frame generation in general, not necessarily in context of blur.I'm pressing hard for BFI eventually in OLED, but it won't be in this first generation of 240Hz OLEDs at this time.
That being said -- long term, strobeless blur reduction will be the way to go. BFI will be mainly useful only for framerate-limited content (retro content, video content), when all PC games implement this technology. An RTX 4090 can now do 4K 1000fps 1000Hz with that new reprojection software technology, ported from VR. Doing 1ms MPRT ergonomically strobelessly with the same motion clarity as strobing is now within the window of this decade's technology -- at least for PC gaming.
I just left gamer at default colorspace on Gamer, it's probably best to use the Calibration 1 and Calibration 2 for specific colorspaces. Even though it has processing latency, personally I can't tell the difference between DAS on or off.
I was able to get Gamer very accurate in sRGB with DisplayCal using an ICC profile but decided against it. Since I rather not have to manage the profiles.
If I were to use ICC profiles for Gamer I would probably do them in P3 at 2.2 gamma. I do wish there were actual gamma settings in the OSD other than "modes" with no description.
Brightness alters black levels if I recall.I'm thinking people who say this monitor is too dim just don't know how to adjust the settings.
Does Nvidia control panel brightness make a difference?
I'm by no means an expert in calibration, I do graphic design so typically use sRGB/adobeRGB/CMYK. Maybe someone with more knowledge will post a definitive answer on which is best for color accuracy in games, I would assume targeting sRGB since most games are developed with it first then HDR dci-P3 is an afterthought. I'm just starting to like the P3 colorspace lately.
Is there a list of which modes use ABL?
I'm thinking people who say this monitor is too dim just don't know how to adjust the settings.
Does Nvidia control panel brightness make a difference?