Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because here we know if you care about the performance of a 1030 at all, you've made a mistake. for not that much more, you can get a low-profile, slot-powered 1050 or RX460, both of which will provide an adequate (read:console-like) gaming experience.How it is that on other forums people are posting screenshots like this when asked same and here they just talk shit?
well then just wait a week for VegaWell, I have already said that 1050 argument isn't best in my case because here those cards ain't as cheap as on newegg while I know plenty of miners are just waiting for Vega/Volt real results and will be replacing their lower end cards(1060 etc) if satisfied.
I'd really like to know where you are getting this from. Memory overclocking of video cards has never offered more performance then core speed.Yeah but in case of 1030 it's not few percent boost because of 64-bit limitation. Effectively in games faster memory should give much more because it's bottlenecking whole system. Synthetic benchmarks will never show it because they almost always made to max out system but games are just using certain size of textures or models and will never make card run at 100% efficiency.
that's straight up not true; the GT1030 has comparable bandwidth per stream processor as the 1050Ti, and 1050Ti's don't magically become 30% faster when you overclock the memory.Yeah but in case of 1030 it's not few percent boost because of 64-bit limitation. Effectively in games faster memory should give much more because it's bottlenecking whole system. Synthetic benchmarks will never show it because they almost always made to max out system but games are just using certain size of textures or models and will never make card run at 100% efficiency.
How it is that on other forums people are posting screenshots like this when asked same and here they just talk shit?
I'd really like to know where you are getting this from. Memory overclocking of video cards has never offered more performance then core speed.
I'd really like to know where you are getting this from. Memory overclocking of video cards has never offered more performance then core speed.
You got me there, but applies to just about anything in the last ten years.Clearly you never overclocked the GeForce 2 GTS.
10% extra? Does it make much of a difference?
the GT1030 has half the bus width, yes, but also half the CUDA coresExcept in this case GT 1030 has 64-bit bus while GTX 1050 128-bit. And with such bandwidth limits this completely stripped Pascal core is still way ahead, waiting. GT 1030 GDDR5 should be exactly same as 1050 one so it should be easily possible to hit default 7000MHz or push it higher. I've read some online reviews where people claimed to easily hit over 8000MHz and even close to 9000MHz so I wanted to verify this.
yes, the 112GB/s is sufficient, and the 48GB/s is pretty close to half that, so the 1030 should be fine. 1050/Ti's exhibit minimal gains from memory overclocking, so there's no reason to believe that aggressive RAM overclocks will boost 1030 performance. at best go bump the clocks to do 56GB/s, which any Pascal can do, and stop worryingIt's quite obvious that bottleneck is in 48GB/s bandwidth, 1050/Ti both use same 112GB/s and it's enough for everything those cards can compute.
Thing is, the GT 1030 doesn't support direct streaming; in fact, has ANY GeForce GT ever supported it?. Also, has any GTX (Ti or not) NOT supported streaming since nVidia kicked the CPU requirement to the curb? They are quite fair questions - especially since the GT 1030 and GTX 1050 Ti can - literally in most cases - fit in the same PCs; the one advantage the GT 1030 has is price.
Also the 30watt power draw. In many small Form factor OEM machines, the motherboards though rated for 75watt through the pcie slot simply cannot power the gtx 1050 or rx460 cards and the systems don't boot. In such case a 30watt GFX will happily work.
The GTX 1050Ti power draw is twice that (a mere 67 watts at worst for a no-extra-power version - such as my MSI GT OC, or EVGA's GTX 1050Ti SSC). Unless you explicitly need a low-profile version, either will in fact do. Thirty-seven watts is typically not going to be a PSU breaker, even at the low end, unless you are talking sub-200W PSUs - in which case that PSU needs upgrading - even with a GT 1030 in it. Also, aren't those same GT 1030s halved by comparison (not just in terms of bandwidth, but in terms of RAM loadouts)? Not to mention that some even short-shrift them by using DDR3 (as opposed to GDDR5)?
And in case you didn't notice, 67W is eight watts LESS than that 75W rating - hence my referring to the PSU in those same machines being a sore spot - even with a GT 1030. Therefore I wasn't trying to upsell when I referred to the sole GT 1030 advantage being price - back when the cryptomining craziness restarted this spring, I had, in fact, added the GT 1030 to the consideration matrix; however, it did way too little to warrant serious consideration compared merely to the GTX 1050 Ti - I would have been better off standing pat with the GTX 550Ti I was running at the time - which I in fact did for a month.
To answer's OPs question. I currently have 2 GT1030, one from MSI and another from Palit, my MSI can reach a max boost of 1900Mhz(+160) core and 7200Mhz(+600) memory. will provide my Palit result later.
EDIT: I know that the cost to performance of this card is not as good as the 1050ti's but this card is really amazing for casual and esports games. could also run a lot of triple A titles at lower graphical settings. dunno what's the hate with this card
To answer's OPs question. I currently have 2 GT1030, one from MSI and another from Palit, my MSI can reach a max boost of 1900Mhz(+160) core and 7200Mhz(+600) memory. will provide my Palit result later.
EDIT: I know that the cost to performance of this card is not as good as the 1050ti's but this card is really amazing for casual and esports games. could also run a lot of triple A titles at lower graphical settings. dunno what's the hate with this card
This thread is over 3 years old. The OP hasn't been here since this thread died off.How high were you able to overclock your GT 1030s?
I am at 1773 mhz boost and 7000 mhz memory. I will try to push it further tomorrow.
^this.Just rename it to [F]loppy|Forums already and be done with it.
no, no it is not and you necro'd this for no reason.GT 1030 overclocking more relevant than ever though.
"Just buy a 1050" isn't really an option right now.