Chris_Morley
Former [H] Consumer Managing Ed.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2000
- Messages
- 3,609
Our latest evaluation is up, and you can check it out here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I quoted it this way so you would know where to make the correction.However...
Operating a stable machine is different from running a machine that has been optimized. In our case, the 9310XL has a few points holding it back from being a truly exceptional machine.
First, get rid of the bloatware. While there is money to be made by installing software from certain vendors, consider the hassle that it creates for the customer. If a software vendor's product includes what is commonly held as spyware, don't install it. Leave installing toolbars in Internet Explorer to the customer. Finally, only install McAfee OR Norton, but not both. From what I could gather on Gateway's website, you have the option as to which you get, but I'm not sure why both were installed on our machine. It's overkill, and it only creates a frustrating computing experience.
Next, make sure your drivers are up to date. The first thing I noticed when I received this machine was that the NVIDIA drivers were version 71.25 from 1/10/5, which was about 2 generations behind the latest available on NVIDIA's website. While Gateway seems to do a good job of offering newer drivers on their website as they become available, they are still behind, and this machine should have come with newer drivers. In addition, having to upgrade the Intel chipset drivers to alleviate a performance issue in BF2 could have been avoided by installing newer drivers to begin with. Even thought BF2 came out after I received this machine, there are certain problems down the line you can avoid by always making sure you're sending out the latest Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL) certified drivers. As it stands, the Intel chipset .inf drivers were dated from early 2004 and were at least one generation too old at the time our 9310XL shipped. Had Gateway shipped the machine with one generation newer drivers, I would not have had to deal with the performance degradation that I experienced before upgrading the drivers.
Finally, come up with a disaster recovery process that at least allows the customer to install a fresh copy of Windows XP. It is nerve racking to have the only factory-restoration media on the very computer that may require it, while it is up to the customer to create their own restore media...that they can only do once.
Thanks man!supertech said:Another great review Chris
I look at Gateway with a little more respect..
qdemn7 said:Extremely well written article Morley. I'm very impressed by this machine. Personally I've always thought of Gateway as a 1.5 Tier company, and this changes my mind. I'm especially impressed by how quiet the machine is. After years of O/C and Tornado-like fans, I've given up on all that noise and gone the Silent PC route.
I have only one negative comment, and that is what I feel is an omission on your part. The only read concern I have about OEMs these days, especially Dell is the use of proprietary parts. Dell is using a completely proprietary PSU design in their high-end XPS machines, is the Gateway PSU proprietary? If someone asks me for recommendation on an OEM machine, this is something I would want to tell them about.
Is the mobo proprietary? Yes it uses an Intel 915 BTX board but that doesnt mean a whole lot since OEM routinely subcontract out their mobos to a Taiwanese company.
I would like to see this issue addressed in future OEM reviews. Other than that very well done.
PM's are much more couteous for this kind of thing.Major_A said:I quoted it this way so you would know where to make the correction.
Thanks for the suggestion, we are indeed going to be doing a budget machine next, and we are changing the games lineup to cover a wider breadth of gameplay...PCJ said:I really like the idea of making reviews that are not only for the hardcore market.
I love the idea of stating what bloatware is on it, how the keyboard/mouse feel, and so on. That's SOOOO much more important than those extra 2 fps.
For the next system, how about reviewing one that is a little more budget-minded?
edit: For the benchmarks, maybe skip a game or two to add more office-like benchmarks.
Like along the lines of "We had 3 windows of firefox running, were burning a CD, editing a file in photoshop and chatting on ICQ all while watching a DVD. This was/was not a smooth experience."
While that is highly subjective, I think it matters more than game benchmark number 58. If a game does well in HL2, Doom3, FarCry and Splinter Cell, I'd expect it to perform well in other games too.
Perhaps try more different games. 3 shooters (the big 3 I guess, HL2 D3 and FC), 1 or 2 RTS (while having some huge battle. Supreme Commander should be good for this when it comes out), and, say, WoW (which was a good start on getting more variety).
Not everyone plays FPS all the time, even though they tend to have the best graphics.
qdemn7 said:Extremely well written article Morley. I'm very impressed by this machine. Personally I've always thought of Gateway as a 1.5 Tier company, and this changes my mind. I'm especially impressed by how quiet the machine is. After years of O/C and Tornado-like fans, I've given up on all that noise and gone the Silent PC route.
I have only one negative comment, and that is what I feel is an omission on your part. The only read concern I have about OEMs these days, especially Dell is the use of proprietary parts. Dell is using a completely proprietary PSU design in their high-end XPS machines, is the Gateway PSU proprietary? If someone asks me for recommendation on an OEM machine, this is something I would want to tell them about.
Is the mobo proprietary? Yes it uses an Intel 915 BTX board but that doesnt mean a whole lot since OEM routinely subcontract out their mobos to a Taiwanese company.
I would like to see this issue addressed in future OEM reviews. Other than that very well done.
Strictly taken the CPU isn't passively cooled in this system as a fan is ducted to the heatsinkjebo_4jc said:BTX is kewl .I would never even consider passive cooling for my GPU/CPU--it's just not really possible. The fact that Gateway was able to keep a 6800U stable with passive cooling and poor cable management is awesome. Quiet computing here we come! Good review.
True, but when you are pseudo-passively cooling a 6800 Ultra then LMKElledan said:Strictly taken the CPU isn't passively cooled in this system as a fan is ducted to the heatsink
I've actually done a similar thing with all of my ATX systems: a duct runs from the CPU's heatsink to the back exhaust fan. This way all heat produced by the CPU is immediately removed from the system.
Good review, BTW
cool. the funny thing about the passive video card cooling is that was my first thought when i bought my first BTX system back in April: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=905747 (pictures are down, sorry).Morley said:Our latest evaluation is up, and you can check it out here.
pxc said:The thickness of the cooling doesn't matter though. It would be interesting to add a tall heatpipe on a video card in a BTX case because it won't interfere with anything. That could eliminate one of the fans since the airflow from intake fan would run through it.
Do you have a pic of your BTX system? Kudos on the heat pipe call...it's a good idea and I was tickled to see it in the Gateway. I'm building a BTX system for my dad, using Chenbro's miniBTX chassis.pxc said:cool. the funny thing about the passive video card cooling is that was my first thought when i bought my first BTX system back in April: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=905747 (pictures are down, sorry).
Thanks man!QwertyJuan said:Excellent job Chris.
As for the McAffee and Norton, I've seen the same thing on some HP junk, a friend of mine bought, for $499, along with Spysweeper.
QJ