I've been shopping for a new build lately and have picked up my I7 920. When I started shopping for motherboards the first thing I wanted was USB 3.0 due to it usually being a long time before I upgrade. When researching boards I found the Asus P6x58D to be $100 or 50% more expensive then the Gigabyte UD3R.
Why would it be so much more expensive? What makes the asus board better? Please give me unbiased opinions on this because it has be stumped. They both have support for:
- 32nm Hexacores
- USB 3.0 and Sata 3 ( with the same chip actually)
- X58 NB
- ICH10R southbridge
- seemingly the same overclock ability
- triple channel memory
- Realtek ALC889
the only thing I really see is the UD3r has 1 less LAN controller which is fine for me anyway.
I do like the look of the asus board a lot more but its not worth paying $100 more when I could go from a 5830 -> 5850....
any help here as to why the ASUS is more expensive?
Why would it be so much more expensive? What makes the asus board better? Please give me unbiased opinions on this because it has be stumped. They both have support for:
- 32nm Hexacores
- USB 3.0 and Sata 3 ( with the same chip actually)
- X58 NB
- ICH10R southbridge
- seemingly the same overclock ability
- triple channel memory
- Realtek ALC889
the only thing I really see is the UD3r has 1 less LAN controller which is fine for me anyway.
I do like the look of the asus board a lot more but its not worth paying $100 more when I could go from a 5830 -> 5850....
any help here as to why the ASUS is more expensive?