![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
What kind of proc is my 3.06 HT laptop proc?
- Thread starter jordan12
- Start date
eighteen_psi
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2002
- Messages
- 1,030
Well, being a 3.06GHz part (and HT enabled) makes it a pentium 4. A 533MHz FSB P4 at that. This, and being a Sager, makes it a desktop-spec part, meaning yes, it sucks down the juice 
IIRC, P4-M's aren't made in this specificaion, and even if they were, Sagers use desktop CPUs almost entirely.
It's not a pentium M. Its good because it's a pretty damn quick CPU. Its bad because it sucks down the juice and pours out the heat
What is it exactly? The exact same thing you'd put in a S478 desktop.
IIRC, P4-M's aren't made in this specificaion, and even if they were, Sagers use desktop CPUs almost entirely.It's not a pentium M. Its good because it's a pretty damn quick CPU. Its bad because it sucks down the juice and pours out the heat
What is it exactly? The exact same thing you'd put in a S478 desktop.
eighteen_psi said:Well, being a 3.06GHz part (and HT enabled) makes it a pentium 4. A 533MHz FSB P4 at that. This, and being a Sager, makes it a desktop-spec part, meaning yes, it sucks down the juice
It's not a pentium M. Its good because it's a pretty damn quick CPU. Its bad because it sucks down the juice and pours out the heat
What is it exactly? The exact same thing you'd put in a S478 desktop.
In other words, it is truly a desktop chip, instead of a mobile chip
But any advantages to using the desktop chip, vs the P4M equivalent?
P4-M maxes out at 2.6GHzsavantu said:
The "mobile pentium 4" is not the same as the "mobile pentium4-m". He has a mobile pentium 4 (no -M).
This is the list of mobile pentium 4 chips: http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/default.asp?CHRID=1025 (click go)
He probably has this chip: http://processorfinder.intel.com/sc...Fam=1025&PkgType=ALL&SysBusSpd=ALL&CorSpd=ALL
eighteen_psi
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2002
- Messages
- 1,030
Not saying pxc is wrong...that may in fact be what's in it. My sager (since sold) had a fully normal desktop-spec CPU in it...that's the only reason I figured yours might be. Its either what pxc said, or a full-issue desktop one, either way.
Open it and look?
Either way you have the same performance though. The desktop chip is no more potent than the M equivalent. Just cheeper.
Open it and look?
Either way you have the same performance though. The desktop chip is no more potent than the M equivalent. Just cheeper.