ok, im having a little trouble justifying a dell 2005FPW over a Viewsonic VA1912wb ....
yes, the dell has a higher native resolution.1680x1050 x 1440x900
The viewsonic has a faster advertised response time though.
the viewsonic lacks in contrast ratio (600:1 dell vs 500:1 Viewsonic)
They have the smae brightness (300cdm/2)
I'm just a little confused about how to justify the extra one and one tenth inches of real estate, for so much more cake. I can snag the Viewsonic for $385 CDN, whereas the Dell is $749 CDN.
That's nearly double the price
Those that have tried the two monitors, is the dell worth the extra coin?
yes, the dell has a higher native resolution.1680x1050 x 1440x900
The viewsonic has a faster advertised response time though.
the viewsonic lacks in contrast ratio (600:1 dell vs 500:1 Viewsonic)
They have the smae brightness (300cdm/2)
I'm just a little confused about how to justify the extra one and one tenth inches of real estate, for so much more cake. I can snag the Viewsonic for $385 CDN, whereas the Dell is $749 CDN.
That's nearly double the price
Those that have tried the two monitors, is the dell worth the extra coin?