wonderfield
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 7,396
There's no "directed airflow" on a Titan Z, either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes there is, actually. The card is vented in only two places (one at each end). Air moves parallel to the slot at all times.There's no "directed airflow" on a Titan Z, either.
No. There are additional slots on both the top and bottom of the shroud from which air can enter/exit. They are simply not as numerous nor as large, generally speaking, as those on the 295X2's shroud.Yes there is, actually. The card is vented in only two places (one at each end). Air moves parallel to the slot at all times.
Not sure what you're talking about, the entire top of the Titan Z's shroud is solid (aside from where the central intake-fan is mounted, obviously).No. There are additional slots on both the top and bottom of the shroud from which air can enter/exit.
The card is vented in only two places (one at each end).
...That's a pretty insignificant slat...
The fact that there's a small nick in the shroud doesn't really change the obvious exit-points for airflow at each end of the cooler
How exactly is it a fail product when there isn't anything wrong with the product, though?
That's the one thing nobody seems to be able to answer. The price is too high (this is well established), but what's actually wrong with the product?
They failed miserably at appropriate pricing, sure.
But again, the hardware works just fine, so nothing there has failed.
Right... that's what I've been saying from the start, that the Titan Z's price is the problem (you even call it the MAIN problem). But that doesn't change the fact that there's nothing wrong with the Titan Z itself.
Except I'm not. I've said from the start that the price is too high (I'll go as far as to say ridiculously high, even). Any time the price comes up I immediately agree that it's too high, that's the OPPOSITE of brushing it off.I'm tired of you trying to brush the price off the Titan Z.
I can read just fine, there are plenty of comments saying things along the lines of "The Titan Z is a joke" without actually explaining why.No one in this thread is saying the card itself is bad you r tard. Can you read that?
Right, so the asking price is a problem. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the Titan Z, though.Price is one of the biggest factors on whether if the product will fail or succeed. At $3,000, it is already TWO TIMES in the price of its competing counterpart.
Not sure what you're talking about, the entire top of the Titan Z's shroud is solid
That's a pretty insignificant slat compared to the 295X2's all-the-way-around venting:
What point would that be, exactly?
How exactly is it a fail product when there isn't anything wrong with the product, though?
I agree that the price tag is too high (I've said as much, multiple times), but that doesn't make the card itself a joke, just the asking price. Everything else about the card seems solid for a ~$1300 part, only problem is, it's currently priced at $3000.
Yup.
The price tag is what you pay for the Titan Z, but it in no way changes what the Titan Z is.
Doesn't matter if it costs $1 or $10,000, the Titan Z itself remains exactly the same card.
Which doesn't matter if priced appropriately.
Thus, the Titan Z's price is the problem.
No, look at the photo, the entire top is solid (aside from the fan hole, which should be obvious). Just like I said.So it's not solid like you claimed...
Yes, it would have helped if the slat was on the face of the card that he said I would find it on, though.At least you know what he's talking about now...
No you haven't, please read more carefully. You've been misreading and attempting to pass your misunderstanding off as a correction, which I've then had to continually go back and re-correct.For someone accusing others of now knowing how to read, I've had to correct you on what was actually said and not said quite a lot lately.
Not at all. I'm attempting to argue and have succeeded in arguing the following:...or are you attempting to argue that small slat is significant, even when airflow is parallel to the slat (and so isn't likely to take that path), and there's a giant gaping hole (aka, the end of the shroud) right next to it?
1. Which is a problem with the price, not a problem with the Titan Z itself.Take your own advice that you have shat upon others so much: READ AND COMPREHEND.
It has been clearly stated numerous times now that Titan Z is a fail/joke because of two key pieces of criteria that go hand-in-hand:
1. The $3000 price tag.
2. It's inability to outperform the competition's flagship product that costs half as much.
Yup, very simple, the price is a problem.Simple, right? Hell, you've even stated in this thread and others that it's performance trades blows with the 295x2 and that the price is a joke.
Once again, that only highlights that that the asking price is a joke, not the Titan Z itself.nVidia chose to set the price of their flagship product with underwhelming performance at twice the price of their competitors flagship product. And, once again, THAT IS WHY TITAN Z IS A FUCKING JOKE.
That's a safe assumption, no failure there. That pricing would change most people's tune about this card.Without it even having to nor needing to be be stated, you've failed to easily apply logic and make the assumptive consideration that we would all be humming a different tune about this GPU if two things happened from the very beginning:
1. It was priced <= $1500 to be a true competitor to the 295x2.
I never commented on Nvidia's review sample policy having an effect on user perception. No failure there as this was never a point of mine.2. nVidia would be willing to provide samples to hardware review sites such as [H], even if they didn't have any on hand to send.
How would a $1200 Titan Z not get it out of "are ya shittin' me?" status?Even if the performance remained at or slightly below the 295x2 as it does now, one or the other will not get it out of "are ya shittin' me?" status.
Well, as said, the first one is a problem with pricing, not a problem with the Titan Z itself.Both have to occur. But neither have occurred. Until then, the Titan Z is, and remains, a COMPLETE FUCKING JOKE.
Except I'm not. I've said from the start that the price is too high (I'll go as far as to say ridiculously high, even). Any time the price comes up I immediately agree that it's too high, that's the OPPOSITE of brushing it off.
I can read just fine, there are plenty of comments saying things along the lines of "The Titan Z is a joke" without actually explaining why.
The price keeps being thrown around, but nobody here is disagreeing that the price is absurd. Still waiting for a reason to call the Titan Z itself a joke, though.
Right, so the asking price is a problem. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the Titan Z, though.
Except I'm not. I've said from the start that the price is too high (I'll go as far as to say ridiculously high, even). Any time the price comes up I immediately agree that it's too high, that's the OPPOSITE of brushing it off.
I can read just fine, there are plenty of comments saying things along the lines of "The Titan Z is a joke" without actually explaining why.
The price keeps being thrown around, but nobody here is disagreeing that the price is absurd. Still waiting for a reason to call the Titan Z itself a joke, though..
That's a very cute and admirable attempt, but the disingenuousness here is obvious.The slat he pointed out is on the side of the shroud, not the top.
What do you mean? That's not the top of the shroud.That's a very cute and admirable attempt, but the disingenuousness here is obvious.
Incorrect, you have not succeeded in any of the following. Allow me to elaborate:Not at all. I'm attempting to argue — and have succeeded in arguing — the following:
I am familiar with its cooler.A) You're unfamiliar with the Titan Z's cooler, or at least you were before I informed you of some of its particulars.
As I said, the top and bottom are solid. The side has small slats that are insignificant to the overall function of this blower cooler, and do not disrupted the directed-airflow nature of the cooler.B) You cannot count. There is not only a single 'slat'. I suggest taking a closer look at the cooler and tally the number of openings along the top and bottom of the shroud.
I already showed that this is totally false.C) Any sensible definition of "no directed airflow" that could encompass the 295X2's cooler similarly encompasses the Titan Z's.
Except the price doesn't change anything about the Titan Z itself. It's still the same card, and it seems there's still nothing that makes the Titan Z itself a joke.The REASON the Titan Z is a joke is because of its PRICE! get it? of course u don't get it....15 pages of thread later.......
The part where that phrase is inaccurate. DejaWiz called the Titan Z a joke on page 1... not "the price of the Titan Z," but "the Titan Z."What part of the phrase " no one is saying the Titan Z is a bad video card" do you not understand? I beginning to think you have no life whatsoever.....zzzzzzzz
No you haven't, please read more carefully. You've been misreading and attempting to pass your misunderstanding off as a correction, which I've then had to continually go back and re-correct.
You can't "recorrect" since I quoted you directly. You may succeed in this line of argument in a verbal conflict since you can say "I never said that" but there's documentation here, so again. Unless you can go back in time, you're the one who's being corrected by just about everyone who's participated in this thread.
There are instances where you quoted me directly and then immediately grossly misinterpreted the quote. So yes, I can correct you in those instances.You can't "recorrect" since I quoted you directly.
Documentation which you continually fail to read correctly. I always restate exactly what I DID say after pointing out all the things you seem to think I've said but didn't actually say.You may succeed in this line of argument in a verbal conflict since you can say "I never said that" but there's documentation here
No need to go back in time, you just need to read more carefully so I don't have to correct you every time you post.Yso again. Unless you can go back in time, you're the one who's being corrected by just about everyone who's participated in this thread.
Incorrect. Your very own "hall of shame" post is a testament to the opposite.you're the one who's being corrected by just about everyone who's participated in this thread.
No, compiler bugs are often more difficult to reason aboutThis is like providing infallible code logic to a compiler but getting a runtime error...JFC
I'll argue that if the Titan Z is overpriced against it's competition, then the Titan is similarly overpriced against the R9 290X as the price differential is even worse. There is no value to be found in purchasing a GTX Titan video card at this time.
When the Titan came out AMD fans complained loudly about the cost. Now that the 295x is even more expensive, either no AMD fan will buy it or they are hypocrites. Personally I come from a time when computer parts were super expensive for just average stuff so these prices don't phase me. I'm curios why the same people who complained about the $1000 titan are now silent on the $1500 cost of the 295.
There are instances where you quoted me directly and then immediately grossly misinterpreted the quote. So yes, I can correct you in those instances.
Documentation which you continually fail to read correctly. I always restate exactly what I DID say after pointing out all the things you seem to think I've said but didn't actually say.
This line of argument works perfectly well here, especially since I can just restate what you quoted until you eventually understand it (or forget about it and move on, which seems to be what usually happens).
No need to go back in time, you just need to read more carefully so I don't have to correct you every time you post.
Incorrect. Your very own "hall of shame" post is a testament to the opposite.
With a normal blower cooler, PCB, VRM, and RAM heat picked up by said cooling plate would be sent out the back of your case.
With the R9 295X2, there's no directed airflow (the on-card cooler vents on all sides), so all of that PCB, VRM, and RAM heat will end up inside of your case.
Key distinction.
The REASON the Titan Z is a joke is because of its PRICE! get it? of course u don't get it....15 pages of thread later.......
When the Titan came out AMD fans complained loudly about the cost. Now that the 295x is even more expensive, either no AMD fan will buy it or they are hypocrites. Personally I come from a time when computer parts were super expensive for just average stuff so these prices don't phase me. I'm curios why the same people who complained about the $1000 titan are now silent on the $1500 cost of the 295.
It's more than that even. Not only is it overpriced, but it's slower, hotter, and louder than not only it's direct competitor, but even any 2X GK110 cards you could buy instead. All you are saving is one slot. That's it. The card is FAIL on many levels. Price is just the most blatantly obvious fault.
Incorrect. There were plenty, and I've pointed them out to you repeatedly.There were no interpretations on my part.
You misread, misinterpreted, and then went on a tangent based on your own misunderstanding.You said something that was inaccurate or claimed you said something you didn't actually say and I brought it to your attention.
Incorrect, please read more carefully. You yourself have compiled a list that includes all the times I've had to correct you in this thread.You not recognizing is a question of intelligence/ignorance on your part, not interpretation on mine.
I know exactly what I said, it's you who continually demonstrate you can't read.This isn't the first time you haven't had a clue what you yourself have said in the past. Seems like you're getting lost in your own BS.
Not seeing how this in any way disproves what I said. This does not compare against a Titan Z.Your rationalizations are not fact. Nice hypothesis, but reality is different. On the left is the 295X2. On the right is reference 780 ti in SLI. It's clear which is dumping more heat into the case and it's not the 295X2.
All of which become non-issues at a lower price point, as I mentioned previously.It's more than that even. Not only is it overpriced, but it's slower, hotter, and louder
Versus GTX 780 Ti SLI? Nope. You save a slot, you save 125w, and you gain case and motherboard compatibility with many ITX systems (which a normal dual-card config cannot support in any way).All you are saving is one slot. That's it.
How does the price make the card itself a fail? The price has no effect on the card itself, it's still the same Titan Z no matter what the asking price is.The card is FAIL on many levels. Price is just the most blatantly obvious fault.
I never tried to defend the Titan Z's pricing (I've made it extremely clear that I don't like the pricing either), so moot-point.Plenty of "AMD fans" aren't happy with 295X2 pricing. You just don't see them running around post after post for 16 pages trying to defend it.
Which would be great. Never said that wouldn't be a fantastic turn of events.Maybe if nVidia came out with a 780X2 for ~$1000 AMD would have to lower the price of the 295X2?
All of which become non-issues at a lower price point, as I mentioned previously.
Not seeing how this in any way disproves what I said. This does not compare against a Titan Z.
Two GTX 780 Ti's in SLI have a TDP of 500w, the Titan Z has a TDP of 375w. Of course the two GTX 780 Ti's in SLI run hotter than a Titan Z... but that was never a question anyone raised, and has little to do with this thread.
Never calimed it was at a lower price point, simply said that a lower price point makes these non-issues.But IT IS NOT at a lower price point because nVidia chose to price it as it is
Which shortcomings?add the shortcoming that you just stated
Again, how is the Titan Z itself a joke?and the result is the whole thing is a fucking joke
Not arguing semantics, you're simply ot providing much in the way of evidance for the Titan Z itself being a joke.as has been mentioned previously. By a lot of people. Numerous times. Do you finally see the blatantly obvious correlation of cause and effect, or are you going to continue arguing about intangible semantics?
What about the GPU is a joke? The GK110 is quite a popular GPU around here, many people have them in their systems. Hardly seems like a joke at all.Hint: no matter how hard you defend this joke of a GPU, nVidia will not kiss yoru ass and give you a deeply discounted or completely free one...
That would be an even worse comparison, as two 780 Ti's still put out far more heat than a Titan Z in-total.Spin the bottom card around and it will be a more accurate comparison to Titan-Z which will dump all of the heat from the front GPU into the case.
Again, how does the card fail? So far it seems to work fine.It's way more scientific than you just saying so. I wish I could get you an actual thermal image of a Titan-Z, but nVidia isn't forthcoming with review samples because the card fails so badly.
Incorrect, that blower is not extracting "as much heat as possible," as the test was not done with 100% fan speed.How about this...
This is a single 780 ti. Just a single 780 ti with a blower extracting as much heat as possible directly out of the case
READ MY POSTS. I never said the Titan Z (or the 780 Ti) would heat the case less than the 295X2, so that's a totally moot point.still warms the inside of the case more than the 295X2.
What fact needs checking? You're the one who's responding to more claims I never made.You really need to check your facts before you post them here.
PCB components dump plenty of heat into the case, as those thermal images show. A lot of that PCB heat is GPU heat radiating from the side of the CPU not in-contact with a heatsink.The PCB components don't dump that much heat into the case. Most of the heat from the PCB comes from the GPU, not the VRM.