![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
GTMan said:
Exposing a company that engages in fraudulent behaviour is a good thing. Destroying perfectly good computer parts is not. But I would guess that this sort of waste probably doesn't even register for someone who drives a Hummer. Probably just another reason to pat himself on the back. I'm sure the judge in the civil suit will be most impressed with his professionalism.
GTMan said:
Exposing a company that engages in fraudulent behaviour is a good thing. Destroying perfectly good computer parts is not. But I would guess that this sort of waste probably doesn't even register for someone who drives a Hummer. Probably just another reason to pat himself on the back. I'm sure the judge in the civil suit will be most impressed with his professionalism.
GTMan said:
Exposing a company that engages in fraudulent behaviour is a good thing. Destroying perfectly good computer parts is not. But I would guess that this sort of waste probably doesn't even register for someone who drives a Hummer. Probably just another reason to pat himself on the back. I'm sure the judge in the civil suit will be most impressed with his professionalism.
(no really!)GTMan said:
Exposing a company that engages in fraudulent behaviour is a good thing. Destroying perfectly good computer parts is not. But I would guess that this sort of waste probably doesn't even register for someone who drives a Hummer. Probably just another reason to pat himself on the back. I'm sure the judge in the civil suit will be most impressed with his professionalism.
GTMan said:
Exposing a company that engages in fraudulent behaviour is a good thing. Destroying perfectly good computer parts is not. But I would guess that this sort of waste probably doesn't even register for someone who drives a Hummer. Probably just another reason to pat himself on the back. I'm sure the judge in the civil suit will be most impressed with his professionalism.
welcomerain said:
welcomerain said:
but then immediately turn around and tell himwelcomerain said:
. You're telling him not be judgmental, right after you've been judgmental...welcomerain said:
It's spelled hypocrisy, my friend.welcomerain said:
and yet you've already contradicted him once, and now a second time...welcomerain said:
. While this may certainly be true, that doesn't mean Kyle shouldn't be scrutinized. To claim that our leaders, be it in our home-town communities our in our internet communities, should not be scrutinized is a terrifying suggestion to make.welcomerain said:
. Really? Every little bit helps--http://folding.stanford.edu ...welcomerain said:
. Now, while we may all be glad to hear this, and certainly Kyle most of allwelcomerain said:
, GTMan never said you did...There's no reason to just assume that we suspect you of this; unless there is a reason you'd like to share..."dispensate" is not a word; i believe the word you are looking for is dispense. The proper conjugation for your usage is dispensing... Just in case you're still confused...welcomerain said:
Merriam-Webster Online ([url said:
Honey, since accusations is plural we must use the third person plural of the verb to have. That would be have. The sentence should read: "therefore, any accusations of my bias towards kyle have been preemptively dismissed."welcomerain said:
. You say:welcomerain said:
...quite the hypocrite, aren't we, and oops! this is after telling him to not be a hypocrite...hmm...conrtadiction number three!welcomerain said:
iZero said:The whole thing seems silly to me. I thought the Phantom wasn't supposed to exsist, yet there it is.
second thing would be no one knows why kyle did what he did I my self think that it is funny and makes good entertainment if you dont agree with it fine but lets not turn this thread into a flame war thanks Longtimelurker said:Typical comments begins here:
I've been reading the website for several years, but i never really followed the forums except for the daily forum headups, but I just had to register to post my opinion about this.
What is going on? I know that theres a lot of bad blood between the admins at hardocp and the company behind the phantom, but was this kind of mtv jackass-type of stunt reallly needed? We all know whats going to happen to the Phantom in the long run, and we dont need to comment further on the subject.
This feels like such a cheap publicity stunt. OK WE GET IT. Like some other guy said previously, maybe the hardocp team should work on the articles instead of trying to pimp out stuff like that. I mean, after the Doom 3 benchmarks debacle; seriously guys, stop it!
I know that hardocp is aimed at a certain demographic, but for god's sake; just give it up. That "console" isnt getting mentionned anywhere else anymore outside of hardocp; come on, stop beating that dead horse
The kind of strange obessive hate for it is like aintitcool.com Harry Knowles' endless hate for Freddy Prince Junior. I mean who gives a damn about Freddy Prince Jr, and why does he keeps wasting mainpage time on that guy? Nobody CARES ANYMORE!
I think it would be neat if hardocp had some sort of filtering system, like on slashdot, and registered users could filter out certain types of stories, depending on the categories.
Because when i come to Hardocp, i dont want to read puerile (.. to a certain extent..) crap. I realise that i typed 2 pages reply about some guy smashing a prototype pc in a silver box, i mean, who cares about it; but.. is this really front page material? This whole sad episode feels so.. lame
.JPG)
.JPG)
