-=Antimatter=-
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 3,343
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=12285
This isn't something that's highlighted often, but it should be. 3G coverage in the United States sucks, no matter what carrier you're on. We have far more land area to cover than, say, the UK or Japan, but that doesn't mean we can't whine about it.
Kind of puts things in perspective when phone companies will charge more for data plans even without 3G coverage in the majority of areas. If you only have EDGE available, you're still paying the same amount as the guy using 3G. But then again, where does the money come from to invest in 3G infrastructure? It's a chicken-and-egg problem all over again...
This isn't something that's highlighted often, but it should be. 3G coverage in the United States sucks, no matter what carrier you're on. We have far more land area to cover than, say, the UK or Japan, but that doesn't mean we can't whine about it.
Kind of puts things in perspective when phone companies will charge more for data plans even without 3G coverage in the majority of areas. If you only have EDGE available, you're still paying the same amount as the guy using 3G. But then again, where does the money come from to invest in 3G infrastructure? It's a chicken-and-egg problem all over again...