Cinebench 2024 Out

CB 2024 keeps on crashing on me. Either it's because of the CPU undervolt or the XMP II memory profile. Didn't bother checking because the PC is 24-7 stable with everything else.
 
Hmm, if this new version is sensitive to memory than it could explain why it's so wonky for me.
It doesn't crash, but it doesn't complete a run either.
It. Just. Gets. Distracted. Mid-
 
It will crash if can't execute the AVX2 instructions, so it need windows repair. It's possible to be and instability too :)
 
6900 XT + 5950X in Eco/65w mode

Screenshot 2023-10-02 103745.png
 
I was having some issues with the multi test not completing reliably about halfway through. test just stopped but computer did not freeze.
Updated my Ram voltage from 1.5 to 1.55 and then it reliably passed those tests. Tried the complete test suite again and it rebooted at some point with WHEA error (still getting system setup after mobo / cpu swap this weekend) I had an all -10 with curve optimizer set and +200 PBO so i took off the curve optimizer to test and it completed.

I had no issues with my settings on other test such as R23 that I ran yesterday so this is definitely more sensitive to system instability.
FYI I am running 4 sticks of dual rank (B Die 16 GB sticks) if you are curious for comparing 5950x scores with different memory types.


1696270198473.png
 
Another set of tests and probably the last ones I do showing the impact of ram on CB24 with Ryzen.

As before, all ram is 3600mhz with a 5950x. This time I just set the clock to 40.

#1 1x16gb SR 906 multi
#2 1x16gb DR 1252 multi
#3 2x8gb SR 1348 multi
#4 2x16gb SR 1350 multi This combo scored 26,943 in cb23
#5 2x16gb SR and 2x16gb DR 1350 multi. Again, orientation didn't matter.
#6 2x16gb SR and 2x8gb SR 1352 multi. 8/16/8/16 vs 16/8/16/8 didn't matter.
#7 2x16gb DR 1491 multi. This one gave 26,864 in cb23
#8 4x16gb DR 1506 multi. This gave 26,861 in cb23

After all these, it is interesting how CB24 on a Zen3 ryzen really cares about ram. A Zen2, doesn't seem to care as much, nor does CB23.
 
Decided to try actually closing the other programs on the system before running it. Got 1123. I think it's in line with most other people that are running the CPU completely on stock settings. The overclocked people probably get higher.

1696459225943.png
 
I changed my settings back down to 3600 instead of whatever I have in my signature. It's a little more stable but it still acts as if the benchmark and the render grid thingy aren't synchronized. It'll run and spit out a score but it always takes at least ten minutes regardless of whether or not I've selected the different run durations.
 
I weas curious ..so I gave it a go

CR24 2220.png


It appears that the 4000 series RTX GPU's just stomp 7000 series GPU's in this particular benchmark (7900XT)
I updated my BIOS right after running this and now the GPU portion crashes when ran .. I get 2223 now on the CPU multi test though
 
ThreeDee said:
I weas curious ..so I gave it a go

View attachment 612201

It appears that the 4000 series RTX GPU's just stomp 7000 series GPU's in this particular benchmark (7900XT)
I updated my BIOS right after running this and now the GPU portion crashes when ran .. I get 2223 now on the CPU multi test though
Click to expand...
Cinebench 2024 uses Maxon Redshift and that suite has some serious CUDA tuning, and support in Redshift for AMD HIP is new and only works on select AMD GPUs.

https://www.maxon.net/en/requirements/redshift-requirements

Low key impressed they added HIP support at all, AMD workstation GPU options have been not awesome for a while now, and Redshift supporting it like that was kind of a big deal.
 
Last edited:
I run 2x32GB GSkill Ripjaws S5 XMP 6400 32-38-38-38-102, 1.4v DDR voltages, 1.3 SOC, UCLK=MCLK/2 @ 6200 28-36-36-36-78, 1.39v DDR, 1.26 SOC, UCLK=MCLK, FCLK=2100, ASRock PBO preset 85c TJMAX, CO-20mv all core, AGESA=Competitive (tightens up subtimings automatically)

I was running CAS30, dropping to 28 I get 2236 on multicore now .. and the GPU test doesn't crash anymore :cautious:
 
ThreeDee said:
I run 2x32GB GSkill Ripjaws S5 XMP 6400 32-38-38-38-102, 1.4v DDR voltages, 1.3 SOC, UCLK=MCLK/2 @ 6200 28-36-36-36-78, 1.39v DDR, 1.26 SOC, UCLK=MCLK, FCLK=2100, ASRock PBO preset 85c TJMAX, CO-20mv all core, AGESA=Competitive (tightens up subtimings automatically)

I was running CAS30, dropping to 28 I get 2236 on multicore now .. and the GPU test doesn't crash anymore :cautious:
Click to expand...
Yeah AMD and their constant fucking around with memory is what keep them off my this is easy list. It is about the only reason I still recommend Intel based systems to groups of people, because you need to know what your doing to deal with those issues and most don’t.
 
Lakados said:
Yeah AMD and their constant fucking around with memory is what keep them off my this is easy list.
Click to expand...
You can say the exact same thing about Intel. Not all their Procie(s) have outstanding IMC thus requiring tinkering around if you want to run the memory frequency beyond XMP and Ring bus.

freeagentt said:
Just run Sammy B-Die on AMD and all of your memory troubles will disappear.
Click to expand...
That only applies to AM4.
Samsung B-Die on DDR5 currently has frequency limit at 6600, max 6800 and can only tighten the timings.
From the tests me, my overclocker's buddies, and the reviews all around the web, the best chip for DDR5 right now:
> 16gb stick: Hynix A-Die, green pcb
> 24gb stick: Hynix M-Die (lower voltage on high freq compared to A-Die 16gb stick), Hynix A-Die (new revision).
 
Stock - PBO Disabled
GTX 1080 @ 61c
5700X Multi Core @ 58c
5700X Single Core @ 56c

5700X_noPBO.PNG


Stock - PBO Enabled
GTX 1080 - 61c
5700X Multi Core - 86c
5700X Single Core - 59c
5700X_PBO.PNG


Man, that 13% boost in Multi Core /w PBO actually makes the HUGE temp jump worth it.... (thankfully it's still within the Tjmax & I'm sure it'll never hit even near that during actual games/daily usage)

- Can anyone suggest a mild voltage offset that might lower those temps to sayyyyy.... 80c?
 
horrorshow said:
Stock - PBO Enabled
5700X Multi Core - 86c
5700X Single Core - 59c

Man, that 13% boost in Multi Core /w PBO actually makes the HUGE temp jump worth it.... (thankfully it's still within the Tjmax & I'm sure it'll never hit even near that during actual games/daily usage)

- Can anyone suggest a mild voltage offset that might lower those temps to sayyyyy.... 80c?
Click to expand...
Can you find Curve Optimizer within your bios?
It's usually at AMD Overclocking menu, and then find PBO.
Set to advance and then find Curve Optimizer.
Try first at -40 on all core, save and reboot. Run CB 2024 to verify the stability and the scoring.
 
Finally got Cinebench 2024 to run on my main PC. I had to lower RAM speed to 6200MT/s from 6400MT/s to get the CPU tests to finish and increase the voltage of the 4090 from 950mV to 960mV to stop the GPU test CTDs. I also disabled WIndows 11 Core Isolation for good measure. This benchmark is very sensitive. I've never encountered any stability issues with other benchmarks/stress tests as well as with gaming/daily use with the previous settings.


CB 2024 GPU.png
 
Was trying to improve my score.. not really much I can do at this point except replace hardware :D

cb24.png
 
Captain Newmackwa said:
Finally got Cinebench 2024 to run on my main PC. I had to lower RAM speed to 6200MT/s from 6400MT/s to get the CPU tests to finish and increase the voltage of the 4090 from 950mV to 960mV to stop the GPU test CTDs. I also disabled WIndows 11 Core Isolation for good measure. This benchmark is very sensitive. I've never encountered any stability issues with other benchmarks/stress tests as well as with gaming/daily use with the previous settings.


View attachment 612826
Click to expand...
Hunt:Showdown game is my go to for RAM stability .. I can run other tests .. do just about whatever .. I run that game and I'll crash to desktop IF my tweaks are only 99.99% stable
 
Dell XSP 8940; i7 11700, 32GB DDR4 Dual Channel @ 2,666 MHz, RTX 3060 12GB (Dell OEM), 256GB NVMe Main/ 2TB Data/ 6TB backup, Win 11 Pro

GPU Score: 8,179 pts
CPU Multi: 570 pts
CPU Single: 89 pts
MP Ratio: 6.41x
Cinebench 2024 results.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top