Boeing's Space Taxi to Use More Than 600 3D Printed Parts

cageymaru

Fully [H]
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Messages
22,111
The 3D printing industry's growth in the past few years has been spurred by gradual acceptance by leading industry manufacturers. Even though 3D printing is still in it's infancy, it has shown it can produce products that are stronger than metal or conventional plastic manufacturing; while weighing significantly less than the competition. The icing on the cake is that 3D printed parts cost less to manufacture.

Aerospace manufacturer Boeing is looking to exploit this manufacturing wunderkind by hiring 3D printing specialists at Oxford Performance Materials to create more than 600 PEKK plastic parts for the 7 seat Boeing Space Taxi program. These plastic PEKK parts are expected to last just as long as conventionally manufactured parts, resist fire and radiation, have a -300°F to 300°F temperature rating, be stronger than aluminum, and cut costs while shaving off 60% weight! Remember that these parts have to be able to survive the extreme stress of rocket launch and sub zero space temperatures! This news would undoubtedly make Spacy9 and other 3D printing hobbyists here on the forums making Kaby Lake delid tools proud. For science!


"What really makes it valuable to NASA and Boeing is this material is as strong as aluminum at significantly less weight," he said. Boeing said the weight savings on Oxford's parts is about 60 percent compared with traditional manufacturing. Boeing is building three Starliner capsules under a $4.2 billion NASA contract. Entrepreneur Elon Musk's SpaceX is building a competing capsule under a $2.6 billion NASA contract.
 
Boeing is still way behind SpaceX here and yet again they do not make a damn thing in house. SpaceX has been using in-house 3-d printed parts in their rockets for 3 years now.
 
Even though 3D printing is still in it's infancy

Fun fact, the traditional FDM method of 3D printing was patented in 1988/89. The company sat on the patent until it expired which is why the RepRap printer came out in 2009.

Imagine how far we'd be if they didn't sit on it and prevent people from using it. Open source did wonders for this technology once that patent expired.

3d manufacturering is also creeping into other areas, including supercar design. The new Koenigsegg One:1 uses many 3D printed parts (they use a laser metal sinter process) for the engine. That process is capable of making a more complex and stronger (+lighter) part using fine metal dust and a laser.
 
Fun fact, the traditional FDM method of 3D printing was patented in 1988/89. The company sat on the patent until it expired which is why the RepRap printer came out in 2009.

Imagine how far we'd be if they didn't sit on it and prevent people from using it. Open source did wonders for this technology once that patent expired.

3d manufacturering is also creeping into other areas, including supercar design. The new Koenigsegg One:1 uses many 3D printed parts (they use a laser metal sinter process) for the engine. That process is capable of making a more complex and stronger (+lighter) part using fine metal dust and a laser.

That's pretty cool! Imagine how many royalties they could have gotten if they had licensed it back then. Probably would have made enough to develop more patents for the technology.
 
(they use a laser metal sinter process)
... which will most likely never make it into the hands of "normal" people due to its complexity and dangers (metal dust is, as they say, fucking dangerous).

no more oppsies with laser toner boys!

3D printing is.. and will always be.. just like every other manufacturing processes and methods... only really feasible in professional realms. Sure... you get lots of tinkerer's having a go in their back yard. But they still have ot put a LOT of time and effort before they can get usable results. And STILL have to trade time and effort for a third thing, skill, that most people lack at least one of these (that damn engineering triangle trade off!).

PS. Oh i also forgot to ad... that altho the "news" sites just love those big headlines fawdaclicks.... it is still just yet another manufacturing method and if anyone has any experience in any of these vast fields know.. they often compliment each other and in many cases rely on each other before you can get the optimum finished component(s). e.g. many metal sintered parts get machined in downstream processes.
 
Last edited:
I hope they use layers of silcone like in motherboards for sheering weight so that when the water vapor or oxygen molecules hits the components they don't deform and crease instead of bouncing back like rubbermaid. grin.
 
Back
Top