cageymaru
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Messages
- 22,103
As an Amazon Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh, but no surround sound or microphone? Meh.Good deal on those M50x's.
Eh, but no surround sound or microphone? Meh.
They're not 'gaming' headphones. They're low end music cans.
"Low end"
Not saying they're not a great set of headphones, but they are considered entry-level to the headphone crowd.
http://www.head-fi.org/a/headphone-buying-guide
I bought these for the same price a few weeks back from a SlickDeals post.
These are good cans for far and away the vast majority of the population, though. Most of the population can't distinguish sounds from even a high bit rate MP3 and a FLAC. Even less actually need higher rated cans, unless maybe they're musicians or work with audio for a living. Unless I just had money to burn, not being an audophile, musician or working with audio for a living, I can't imagine why I would spend more money on a pair of headphones though. These generally go closer the $200 mark though.
Not saying they're not a great set of headphones, but they are considered entry-level to the headphone crowd.
http://www.head-fi.org/a/headphone-buying-guide
My wallet would appreciate it very much if I stopped checking this section so often...
BMW 5 Series is an entry level car if you normally ride around in a Maybach.
I'd more put the M50s @ the Honda Civic level. It's not a Chevy Cobalt; but it's not a 3 series or similar either.
They're not 'gaming' headphones. They're low end music cans.
How would these stack up against my shure 440's? I find the 440's a bit weak on the bass and somewhat uncomfortable.
I bought these for the same price a few weeks back from a SlickDeals post.
These are good cans for far and away the vast majority of the population, though. Most of the population can't distinguish sounds from even a high bit rate MP3 and a FLAC. Even less actually need higher rated cans, unless maybe they're musicians or work with audio for a living. Unless I just had money to burn, not being an audophile, musician or working with audio for a living, I can't imagine why I would spend more money on a pair of headphones though. These generally go closer the $200 mark though.
I got a pair for around 99$ from a store closing sale.
Anyone else notice they get very fatigued after listening to the m50s for around 30m or so?
Maybe you haven't paid attention to m50x pricing the last few years? Camelcc says $130 was the lowest price it's been all year on Amazon, and $15 off the best price from a 3rd party seller.$120 isn't that great of a deal but I guess it;s decent since it's been retailing for more. I got the original M50 a couple years ago for $100 shipped. The M50x is very similar and has a removable cable. I love the cans though!
Maybe you haven't paid attention to m50x pricing the last few years? Camelcc says $130 was the lowest price it's been all year on Amazon, and $15 off the best price from a 3rd party seller.
Also, the m50x has three detachable cables vs the m50. That's at least part of the price difference.
Sale is over tho, price is up a bit to $140 now. I'd guess they'll see another big sale or two b4 xmas tho.