NukeDukem
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,663
I hope AMD can bring something that beats Intel at gaming. I'm thinking about upgrading the 8700k. Would like to go with Team Red this time. Deliver the goods, Dr. Su!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't look it. ASUS announced a new X570 for Zen 3.
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/z...hair-viii-dark-hero-motherboard-pictured.html
Doesn't look it. ASUS announced a new X570 for Zen 3.
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/z...hair-viii-dark-hero-motherboard-pictured.html
Liking the look of that new ROG Hero Dark. Looks like a big heat sink with no active fan on the board.
gotta love fanboys...especially when the comment is not even relevantExcited!!
Time to put nvidia where she belongs!
I think it looks competitive, with good striation between price points. That 5800X is going to move with enthusiasts.November 5th? No 5 GHz? That kinda sucks, but overall it still looks really good. $50 price hike across the stack as well, though.
I'm more surprised they put it front and center in the collage. Yay for transparency I guess but weird choice.I'm kinda surprised with the benchmarks they presented, anybody else notice the -3% in BFV ?? Overall they look solid, I hope on the 28'th they announce Threadripper.
I just let my wife know that the 5950X is in my future and her response was "Cool". Yep, she's a keeper!That $50 bump across the board tells me AMD is very comfortable. All I know is, my wife will hate me when she sees our bank account in November.
supposedly Nov 5'th. But I am pretty sure its already sold outI missed it, when does Zen 3 hit the market?
AMD is missing 5700X with 65Watt TDP. (similar to 3700X). that is the one I am interested in.We now know the price of AMD's Ryzen 5000 processors:
Here are the prices AMD Ryzen 3000 chips launched at for comparison:
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: $799
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: $549
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800X: $449
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: $299
That $50 bump across the board tells me AMD is very comfortable. All I know is, my wife will hate me when she sees our bank account in November.
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950X: $749
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: $399
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600: $199
Companies almost always release the high end first to get as much money from customers who want the best and newest. Price/perf parts to fill out the stack will almost certainly be coming out later. The missing name is a clear clue to that. Its the same idea as the 3080 and 3090 coming out out first and followed by a 3070 with no lower end 3060 parts announced. Just because it hasn't been announced now doesn't mean that they won't fill in the price stack later.I was sad to see they dropped the X700 CPUs. It makes sense since there was practically no reason to pay for the X800 cpus. Raising the price $50 on top of getting rid of the cheaper 8 core option just adds insult to injury.
Companies almost always release the high end first to get as much money from customers who want the best and newest. Price/perf parts to fill out the stack will almost certainly be coming out later. The missing name is a clear clue to that. Its the same idea as the 3080 and 3090 coming out out first and followed by a 3070 with no lower end 3060 parts announced. Just because it hasn't been announced now doesn't mean that they won't fill in the price stack later.
old proverb: good things come to those who wait.Maybe but I'm pretty sure x700's have been part of the launch stack throughout Ryzen and the 5600x is clearly listed. It would be a nice surprise but i'm not holding my breath.
AMD is missing 5700X with 65Watt TDP. (similar to 3700X). that is the one I am interested in.
Looking at the price gap between the 5600X and 5800X there is definitely room to slot in a 5700X. Perhaps something they'll launch down the road? Unless they want to simplify their product stack and only have one of each core and thread configuration.
You can still pick up a current gen Intel cpu for $5-600 with lesser performance. Free will and all.I was sad to see they dropped the X700 CPUs. It makes sense since there was practically no reason to pay for the X800 cpus. Raising the price $50 on top of getting rid of the cheaper 8 core option just adds insult to injury.
Good wakeup call for anyone that still believed AMD isn't in the game for money and was going to sell top tier products at mid tier prices once they fully took the performance crown.
We now know the price of AMD's Ryzen 5000 processors:
Here are the prices AMD Ryzen 3000 chips launched at for comparison:
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: $799
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: $549
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800X: $449
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: $299
That $50 bump across the board tells me AMD is very comfortable. All I know is, my wife will hate me when she sees our bank account in November.
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950X: $749
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: $399
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600: $199
I think you may have missed the point, but thanks for the clarification.You can still pick up a current gen Intel cpu for $5-600 with lesser performance. Free will and all.
Seriously though these prices are fine if they actually deliver as promised. Pretty stoked to see actual reviews.
I wonder if AMD is thinking Renior G is what slots in there. 8 cores 16 threads, 65W power envelope.Well, I am also comfortable waiting another 12 months for AMD to sell this shit on discount. I can wait until Zen 4
And at some point, they have to introduce a 5700X. They can't leave OEMs hanging on 8-core processor (the 3700x needs a replacement for smaller 8-core systems, but may not be worth the margin-cut yet.)
But I'm not surprised they are going for the max performance parts at-launch.
I wonder if AMD is thinking Renior G is what slots in there. 8 cores 16 threads, 65W power envelope.
I'm also going to be choosing between the 5900x and 5800x. On the one hand 5900x should be faster since it has more raw horsepower but it uses an 8+4 CCD design vs the single 8 core CCD of the 5800x so how does that affect latency and performance in gaming?I'm really curious in the difference in performance between the 5800x vs 5900x. I don't need that many cores in the 5900x, but I wonder how much of a difference that 70MB vs 36MB cache really makes
I was sad to see they dropped the X700 CPUs. It makes sense since there was practically no reason to pay for the X800 cpus. Raising the price $50 on top of getting rid of the cheaper 8 core option just adds insult to injury.
Good wakeup call for anyone that still believed AMD isn't in the game for money and was going to sell top tier products at mid tier prices once they fully took the performance crown.