Recent content by Colonel_Blimp

I did buy it, and stuck with it through the overly long snowy start, did a few quests from the camp, got on my horse at the nearest town to find it wasn't my horse! Takes years to get anywhere, utter borefest. However, i haven't uninstalled it yet so you never know though i could probably do...

RDR2 The most boring game I've ever played. Looks nice, waste of money.

Yeah, i realised that, just helping out my UK citizens.

In the UK its probably Overclockers and Scan

What about BF5? Forza Horizon? Etc etc? Maybe i dont get out much but some of those games I've never heard of. Is this accurate from you FuryX users out there or is there a little bit of cherry picking going on ?

I would but she died.

Does it do what you bought it for?

Please buy my gpu's, you can ray trace and everything, even 60fps on a 2060 super !

2600 and a b450 that supports Ryzen 3000 series. Update the Bios so you're ready to pop in a 3600 or 3700x should you feel the need to. Then keep that combo if you're happy with it or sell the 2600 and put the money towards 3600/3700x

Sapphire v56 pulse is samsung ram, undervolt and hbm oc as N4CR says. Its what i bought with a similar dilemma as yours, 1440p and 300 quid tops Mine was £278 in UK but they're around 250 now, so close to $300 Not sure if US pricing is as good though.

Definitely worth waiting, see what Navi brings. If you're dead set on nvidia (why?) then wait to see what they bring when Navi drops.

Neither yet, wait for Navi and decide then. 1050ti too expensive for the performance it delivers so the choice should be 1650 or Navi

My understanding is that irregardless can be used, on it's own. So , History says the green one, irregardless. Or History says the green one, regardless of all other facts. But then I'm British, what would I know!

2070 performance at 2060 price makes perfect sense to me, as does 2060 performance at 1660 price and so on down the stack.

Him and me then, I had an x3 435. Nice chip.