So it's 2x the weight of a mac air, and 1/2 the battery life. Wow, where's the line to buy one lol.AMD and Intel have been doing 8 hours of battery for a while now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So it's 2x the weight of a mac air, and 1/2 the battery life. Wow, where's the line to buy one lol.AMD and Intel have been doing 8 hours of battery for a while now.
That's actually good that Intel and AMD have managed to catch up, a little late to the party but at least they have decided to make an appearance.AMD and Intel have been doing 8 hours of battery for a while now. If you're just watching YouTube constantly then 10 hours is possible on AMD based laptops.
I don't know what you have been ordering but the Mac and Windows laptops we have been ordering are pretty much the same in weight.So it's 2x the weight of a mac air, and 1/2 the battery life. Wow, where's the line to buy one lol.
That depends on your hardware and config an any-any-any-any-any-Deny as rule 1 is becoming more popular for business devices. Home ones not so much.
Allowing all traffic out is dangerous and it’s how breaches go undetected for long periods. Knowing exactly what is trying to leave is just as important as knowing what’s trying to come in.
But it doesn’t match application signatures. Which is what differs layer 7 from standard layer 3 filtering.Considering only NAT, you do not need to forward ports for outbound connections in any scenario that I've ever seen. Once again, malware can also make use of commonly used ports to get around port forwarding.
If you watched the video you can see that at least on AMD you can leave the chip running at full tilt which is like 35W on battery. The downside is that you obviously shorten the battery power. If you think you don't have this problem on M1/M2's then you're wrong. If you play a game on a M1/M2 at full tilt then you only get about an hour and 40 minutes worth out of it. It's all about the load you put on these chips that determines how much power they will consume.Yes. That battery life is possible on Windows laptops with the performance turned way down.
The benefit of Apple's chips is you pretty much get most (if not all) of the performance whether you are plugged in or not. When you unplug these Windows laptops, the performance drops dramatically. But I guess that bit of information isn't helpful for your point.
The 14inch Lenovo Legion slim 5 that they tested is 3.86lbs pounds. The 14inch Macbook Pro is 3.5 lb. Again if you looked at the video the AMD chips last as long if not longer.So it's 2x the weight of a mac air, and 1/2 the battery life. Wow, where's the line to buy one lol.
I'd argue that AMD's Rembrandt had already caught up. The new Ryzen mobile 7000 series chips have surpassed Apple.That's actually good that Intel and AMD have managed to catch up, a little late to the party but at least they have decided to make an appearance.
Well a quick glance at the lenovo site shows the 14inch with a 73wh battery, YOUR video clearly states they are 80wh, which corresponds to the 16 inch that is 5+ pounds.The 14inch Lenovo Legion slim 5 that they tested is 3.86lbs pounds. The 14inch Macbook Pro is 3.5 lb. Again if you looked at the video the AMD chips last as long if not longer.
it actually isnt really. as noted, app based rules, and even then, most networks only need a handful of ports other than 80/8080/443/8443 - you get some for apps outside of that, but for most networks, SMB, Enterprise level, it is not that bad. And a quick search for any app should get you a list of ports you need opened. Done, once done , you dont have to touch em again.You CAN set up a firewall that way, but if you have to manually open every port for every outgoing connection, man that is going to be a hell of a pain in the ass.
You pretty much can if you really want... and using cloud storage, and storing files on say OneDrive or something with auto saving, as soon as it saves, or you save, synced and done..Backups are not excuses for apple's horrible anti-consumer practices. Even though I have backups how much easier it is to just slap the drive into another MB and continue working as if nothing has happened?
You can't have backups that are up to date to the minute anyway.
A smidge more than that, to make mine work I have nearly 200 outgoing rules and 1 incoming.it actually isnt really. as noted, app based rules, and even then, most networks only need a handful of ports other than 80/8080/443/8443 - you get some for apps outside of that, but for most networks, SMB, Enterprise level, it is not that bad. And a quick search for any app should get you a list of ports you need opened. Done, once done , you dont have to touch em again.
Yes, it adds a little more over head and unknown for home users, but any business, should be doing this, but they dont, cause they just think inbound is what matters...
The 16 inch model Lenovo is 5.07lbs. The 16 inch Macbook Pro is 4.8lbs. Not a world of difference.Well a quick glance at the lenovo site shows the 14inch with a 73wh battery, YOUR video clearly states they are 80wh, which corresponds to the 16 inch that is 5+ pounds.
Macbook Air doesn't count because you want to take advantage of the light weight but then you can't complain when it thermal throttles. Can't bounce between both Air and none Air models to win the online spec battle.Also i clearly said mac air, then you brought up a macbook pro for some reason. Like what are you even talking about right now homie?
And why would I want to loose just a days work, or even half a day's work? I don't know where do you get it from that I said people shouldn't have backups? You brought it up that apple's anti consumer bs doesn't matter cuz backups. I said backups are no excuse for apple.You can literally have Time Machine back up every hour, 24 hours a day with a drive connected or any other backup software you want to use. So yes, you can have extremely current backups on either platform. I wasn't disagreeing that their current System-On-A-Chip hardware kind of sucks, but your comment about backups is irrelevant as everyone should have backups.
Yeah, if you are only working with teeny-tiny files. For me having even daily backups is not just impractical, but literally impossible. I work with files in the hundreds of GB range.You pretty much can if you really want... and using cloud storage, and storing files on say OneDrive or something with auto saving, as soon as it saves, or you save, synced and done..
And even with that, if it wasnt down to the minute, it can be with in a few minutes. There are all ways you can do it, if you really want. Logging into an m365 account, on a new system, get onedrive going, sycned - done on new system. App install, sure you got to install some apps, but doing a restore, vs taking a drive out, having an external case , or a system with another slot to put it in, boot, copy files off, or what ever...seems more cumbersome...
Your point was that if something happened to the computer and you couldn't access the drive, you were screwed. This problem is alleviated by having back ups. If your hard drive failed in a Windows computer, you would also be screwed if you didn't have back ups. Yes, Apple having everything soldered to the motherboard is annoying. But your drastic scenario is simply eliminated by having backups. I didn't say what Apple is doing doesn't matter cuz backups. I'm saying your scenario is unrealistic unless you willingly choose not to have a back up plan.And why would I want to loose just a days work, or even half a day's work? I don't know where do you get it from that I said people shouldn't have backups? You brought it up that apple's anti consumer bs doesn't matter cuz backups. I said backups are no excuse for apple.
Nonsense. It's not impossible. It sounds like you just need a backup method that involves Thunderbolt 4 and NVME drives. I work with massive data files as well. I'm not going to use that as an excuse to have a crappy back up plan or even worse ... no back up plan at all. Your hard drive(s) could die at any moment. What would your excuse be if you simply lost everything because you think that backing up is impossible?Yeah, if you are only working with teeny-tiny files. For me having even daily backups is not just impractical, but literally impossible. I work with files in the hundreds of GB range.
And there is one thing that is even more important than the work files themselves, the environment that has dozens of applications installed, and set up perfectly to suit my needs. That is irreplaceable, and will take months for me to get back to the same level if I have to start from scratch because I can't just move my boot drive to a working system.
That’s irresponsible…Yeah, if you are only working with teeny-tiny files. For me having even daily backups is not just impractical, but literally impossible. I work with files in the hundreds of GB range.
And there is one thing that is even more important than the work files themselves, the environment that has dozens of applications installed, and set up perfectly to suit my needs. That is irreplaceable, and will take months for me to get back to the same level if I have to start from scratch because I can't just move my boot drive to a working system.
Not so on a lot of airplanes. I've run out of power on transatlantic flights from the west coast.I guess I just don't understand the usage scenario that makes okg battery life a must have.
Pretty much everywhere you go has outlets.
No power cords and wireless displays only, it's strictly an optics thing 90% of the time but blah blah blah first impressions.
Not so on a lot of airplanes. I've run out of power on transatlantic flights from the west coast.
Yes they are...Wow, people are actually that petty?
When I'm dealing with a dead computer my first action is to remove the SSD and transplant it to another machine. This is a rather quick and simple process. Backups are a last resort, and if the backup is done on the local drive like with TimeMachine then you lose all your data. TimeMachine is more of a solution for when data corrupts, not when the computer no longer functions. You could depend on an external drive to store backups, but who carries around one of those? Time Machine doesn't work with iCloud, but it will backup stuff in the home folder which might work if that's where you store your important documents.Your point was that if something happened to the computer and you couldn't access the drive, you were screwed. This problem is alleviated by having back ups. If your hard drive failed in a Windows computer, you would also be screwed if you didn't have back ups. Yes, Apple having everything soldered to the motherboard is annoying. But your drastic scenario is simply eliminated by having backups. I didn't say what Apple is doing doesn't matter cuz backups. I'm saying your scenario is unrealistic unless you willingly choose not to have a back up plan.
Time Machine requires an external destination...When I'm dealing with a dead computer my first action is to remove the SSD and transplant it to another machine. This is a rather quick and simple process. Backups are a last resort, and if the backup is done on the local drive like with TimeMachine then you lose all your data. TimeMachine is more of a solution for when data corrupts, not when the computer no longer functions. You could depend on an external drive to store backups, but who carries around one of those? Time Machine doesn't work with iCloud, but it will backup stuff in the home folder which might work if that's where you store your important documents.
Having an NVME M.2 based SSD instead of soldering it onto the board would solve a lot more problems than whatever Apple was trying to solve. Lets be honest here, the only reasons Apple solders Nand chips to their boards is to cut costs and to force consumers to spend an abhorrent amount of money for larger storage. Why else would Apple put 256GB of storage that ran at half the speed other than to push consumers to buy the next tier up?
It backs up the entire computer, as is, to an external drive. When you restore from a Time Machine backup, all your files, settings, app, icons, configurations, and everything in between is restored exactly as it was for the last back up. It's a complete system backup.When I'm dealing with a dead computer my first action is to remove the SSD and transplant it to another machine. This is a rather quick and simple process. Backups are a last resort, and if the backup is done on the local drive like with TimeMachine then you lose all your data. TimeMachine is more of a solution for when data corrupts, not when the computer no longer functions. You could depend on an external drive to store backups, but who carries around one of those? Time Machine doesn't work with iCloud, but it will backup stuff in the home folder which might work if that's where you store your important documents.
No, the main reason is because communication between all the parts is faster than them being separate. The problem is how much they charge for storage. The storage on the bottom tier being half the speed is indeed incredibly stupid, I agree. It wasn't like this before. So they're definitely sticking it to the consumers with this choice.Having an NVME M.2 based SSD instead of soldering it onto the board would solve a lot more problems than whatever Apple was trying to solve. Lets be honest here, the only reasons Apple solders Nand chips to their boards is to cut costs and to force consumers to spend an abhorrent amount of money for larger storage. Why else would Apple put 256GB of storage that ran at half the speed other than to push consumers to buy the next tier up?
So, I might as well ask. Why do you care about auto-HDR so much? I've long used HDR displays but would never consider auto-HDR a viable feature in of itself, let alone a reason to upgrade an OS. Is it simply because you know you have HDR displays and that Windows 11 is "activating" that feature for you? Or do you genuinely believe that auto-HDR is better than SDR?For me Auto-HDR is the #1 killer feature. I really love it. Both my HTPC and my backup Gaming computer use HDR-capable GPUs connected to HDR-capable displays, but CPUs that were too old so I had to use a bypass to install Windows 11 on both.
Search has just got a lot of love. It used to be agonizingly slow to do a Windows file search, especially if you have a lot of mapped network drives. It's amazingly snappy now in the latest version of 11.
Multi-path SMB is a cheap and easy way to get speeds above gigabit using nothing but gigabit hardware, and although it existed in 10, it had major issues if you used multiple connections with different speeds. That's fixed in 11 now. So you can combine a gigabit and 100Mbit connection if you want, or even toggle your WiFi on in addition to your wired connection for a speed boost (assuming no bottlenecks in your network topology and that the other end can keep up).
Windows 11 is integrating RGB functionality directly into the OS, in an attempt to clean up the nightmare of different apps from different companies used to control RGB. It's still in it's early stages but I think this is a great move.
Windows 11 will not only restore your programs after you reboot, but will restore them to their previous locations. This is amazing when running 6 monitors.
And that's just off the top of my head. Windows 10 is fine... but I like new features, and I like the way tech evolves over time.
Or do you genuinely believe that auto-HDR is better than SDR?
Okay, so you're presenting SDR and HDR as a spectrum where auto-HDR falls closer on that spectrum to HDR. I personally don't think image quality works that way, but I was curious to see how you thought about it, thanks.On a crappy HDR display without local dimming = no
On a HDR display with local dimming or OLED/emissive = yes - still not as good as true HDR (difference is noticeable) but more towards actual HDR than not to the point that it is obviously better than/improved over SDR
Edit: Also Auto-HDR is not consistent across all games itself, results on 'how good/better' over SDR can very per game because of the conversion of original aesthetics > Auto-HDR
Okay, so you're presenting SDR and HDR as a spectrum where auto-HDR falls closer on that spectrum to HDR. I personally don't think image quality works that way, but I was curious to see how you thought about it.
One reason I'd imagine not being satisfied with that solution is because auto-HDR doesn't have the capability to detect HUD elements. The thing that makes HDR look good doesn't come from a flat boost in contrast, which AFAIK all auto-HDR is capable of. Using auto-HDR reminds me of throwing a sharpening filter on a lower resolution image because it "looks closer" to the higher resolution image (which I suppose is common these days). Particularly if you're mentioning OLED - you're definitely not going to want your HUD receiving that brightness boost. Also in regards to OLED, the OLED also engages in heavy ABL & other potentially annoying "features" when HDR is active. I'd argue it's not worth engaging those features for artificial HDR.You're altering the original image from issued/authored (SDR) - it all relies on equipment/perception/execution of Auto-HDR as there's no true HDR version to compare against (except for titles that have native HDR and Auto-HDR - like the recent Resident Evil titles off the top of my head that you can do A/B comparisons with - but in those instances outside of comparisons it would be dumb to not play in native HDR) - Auto-HDR for me at least comes in handy for older games or the odd recent-ish game where there is no native HDR support.
One reason I'd imagine not being satisfied with that solution is because auto-HDR doesn't have the capability to detect HUD elements. The thing that makes HDR look good doesn't come from a flat boost in contrast, which AFAIK all auto-HDR is capable of. Using auto-HDR reminds me of throwing a sharpening filter on a lower resolution image because it "looks closer" to the higher resolution image (which I suppose is common these days). Particularly if you're mentioning OLED - you're definitely not going to want your HUD receiving that brightness boost.
If you really like the feature, I wouldn't fault you for liking what you think looks better. I'm just having a hard time imagining it as a feature even worth using, let alone worth upgrading my entire OS for.
A smidge more than that, to make mine work I have nearly 200 outgoing rules and 1 incoming.
Incoming is just deny, I don’t have any need for an outside service to initiate a connection to anything in my house.
But strict rules for the PlayStation, the Nintendo, Apple Updates, Microsoft updates, Samsung Tizen, game A, B, C, etc. It adds up over time, FaceTime, took a bit to figure out when Apple added the end to end encryption because it initiates with IKE 400 and blarg that took a hot minute to fish out of the logs but yeah.
You can get things going with web-browsing and SSL. The big question is do you want to run local SSL decrypt or not to ensure bad things aren’t sneaking through that generic SSL allow you need for https. At home no I don’t use it, but at work for sure I do.
Then it’s just a matter of setting up notifications for rules not triggered in 30, 60, 90, and 180 days for review.
What AMD chip?I'm on Win11 now, but I think I feel more stutter in games in 11 than I did 10.
I went back and reinstalled Nvidia drivers and AMD chipset drivers after the "upgrade" but I don't think that solved things.
I'm not sure I have the energy for a from scratch clean install right now...
What AMD chip?
I noticed with my 5950 I needed to run the XBox game bar, and play with Adrenaline a little. It messed up my memory timings, kept lowering them from 3400 to 3000.
AMD sort of gave up thread prioritization for 11 and left it to XBox game bar. It’s basically required for any of AMD’s multi CCD chips there. You don’t need any of the overlays so disable them all, it just needs to be there in the taskbar.Threadripper 3960x. I've never used the Xbox bar. (I've actually often wished I could uninstall it, and been really frustrated that they won't let me)
I generally avoid any overlays or anything running in the background.. Just running it made it run better? That sounds weird.
Wow, people are actually that petty?
I consider myself lucky that I work in Engineering and don't have to deal with this bullshit.
I have over 2 million miles in one of the airline frequent flyer programs, so I've done way too much time on planes. For me, a plane ride is a chance to catch up on email without any distractions. When I got to my hotel, I would dump off all the messages I'd sent out while working offline. For really long trips, I used to carry extra batteries. Yeah, coach is kind of cramped, but I used to try to snag exit row seats. But I also had to deal with a few flaming you-know-whats who spread over into my seat. Then there was the guy in the row adead of me who deliberately jammed his seat all the way way, his seat and the empty seat next to him, just to piss me off.That is a fair comment. I used to have to travel a lot for work, but it has been over a decade at this point.
That said, even when I did, I found I could never quite work on a plane anyway. I used to do supplier audits a lot, and I'd try to write up my audit reports on the plane and I just couldn't do it. Too many distractions, too cramped space. So instead I'd just try to sleep, and write my reports either before takeoff or after landing So, not an issue for me, but I can see how it might be for some.
AMD sort of gave up thread prioritization for 11 and left it to XBox game bar. It’s basically required for any of AMD’s multi CCD chips there. You don’t need any of the overlays so disable them all, it just needs to be there in the taskbar.
Also check for Microsoft KB 5006476, it’s needed to fix L3 Cache issues It may still be an optional update. And I want to say there was a note about the AMD drivers and Auto HDR if you have that enabled, it’s recommended you don’t.
Yeah the Xbox game bar is a requirement especially if you are running the multi CCD x3D chips.Interesting. I had no idea the Xbox game bar did anything outside of annoying streaming bullshit.
I had no idea it could change how the Windows scheduler works.
So you just start it, and then start the game?
I also found quite a few articles from when Win 11 2H22 was new stating how Nvidia users were having issues, and how a few people solved this by DDU:ing their drivers and reinstalling.
I tried it and it seems to have worked.
Because it gave me a tangible improvement to the games that I care about and play the most.So, I might as well ask. Why do you care about auto-HDR so much?
No.Is it simply because you know you have HDR displays and that Windows 11 is "activating" that feature for you?
I believe that first and foremost the capabilities of HDR are dictated by your monitor... If your monitor has a piss-poor HDR implementation, then nothing on the software side is going to fix that, including Auto-HDR. On many monitors, HDR is included more for marketing reasons than as an actual usable feature. HDR was so terrible on my previous monitor (32" Samsung C32HG70) that I just left it on SDR and never used HDR at all. Enabling HDR at all made all SDR content (including the windows desktop) look washed-out and dull, forcing you to toggle HDR on and off constantly depending on what you were doing. In most actual HDR content, things usually looked too dark. Auto-HDR made games actually look less vibrant than just using SDR. No amount of calibration was able to fix this; I tried, for a long time, until I gave up and just started using SDR for everything.Or do you genuinely believe that auto-HDR is better than SDR?
Dude, if you're implying that people on here can't tell the difference between what Auto-HDR does and simply cranking up the contrast... Suffice it to say, most of us weren't born yesterday...The thing that makes HDR look good doesn't come from a flat boost in contrast, which AFAIK all auto-HDR is capable of.
AMD sort of gave up thread prioritization for 11 and left it to XBox game bar. It’s basically required for any of AMD’s multi CCD chips there. You don’t need any of the overlays so disable them all, it just needs to be there in the taskbar.
Also check for Microsoft KB 5006476, it’s needed to fix L3 Cache issues It may still be an optional update. And I want to say there was a note about the AMD drivers and Auto HDR if you have that enabled, it’s recommended you don’t.
I looked and unless I am missing something, which is possible, you cannot run the XBox Gamebar in the background or have it run in the tray. Are you sure you are not speaking of the XBox Game App?
Or the local drive to have a partition for it.Time Machine requires an external destination...
Basically stuff in the home folder. iCloud does not do a 100% local backup.You can select iCloud as the destination for your time machine backups if you want.
Time machine does not backup data you have stored in iCloud nor the OS, just local files, folders, and applications.
USB drives have gotten so big that they can almost do a local backup. I'm afraid the prices will soon jump back up.But nobody carries around an external drive, just like they never carry around their power cords, but sweet Jesus they always need a thumb drive for one reason or another, I can't restock my drawer of them fast enough and nobody ever brings the one they "borrowed" back.
You think Apple did this to reduce communication? It's not like SSD's care about stuff like that. You also see a lot of M.2 based NVME drives that are faster than what you see on Macs, while also being a fraction of the price.No, the main reason is because communication between all the parts is faster than them being separate. The problem is how much they charge for storage. The storage on the bottom tier being half the speed is indeed incredibly stupid, I agree. It wasn't like this before. So they're definitely sticking it to the consumers with this choice.
Not many Apple users are going to go through the trouble of booting to recovery mode, launching disk utility, formatting, re partitioning, and reinstalling so they can run Time Machine locally.Or the local drive to have a partition for it.