Same dude that did the unboxing that was posted earlier (https://hardforum.com/threads/i9-11900k-unboxing.2008941/) - finally got around to running some benches.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Feel the power of 14nm++++++++.280W CPU only stress? For an 8-core CPU??
Yikes.
280W CPU only stress? For an 8-core CPU??
Yikes.
That is double the number of cores, so with AMD you get double the cores, same power envelope as compared to Intel in general.This isn't all that much. Many CPU's can go well beyond that. AMD's Ryzen 9 3950X for example can pull upwards of 300w by itself. I measured over 384 watts at the wall stressing only the CPU. The Core i9 10980XE is even worse, pulling over 617w at the wall stressing only the CPU. Granted, that's the whole system but the GPU at idle only pulls like 15w, chipsets pull 6-15w depending on which one, etc. AMD's top end offerings pull just as much as Intel's under the right circumstances. The difference is that AMD gives you upwards of 16 cores while Intel gives you a max of 10 cores at the same power envelope. With Rocket Lake, you only get 8.
That is double the number of cores, so with AMD you get double the cores, same power envelope as compared to Intel in general.
Right, that is what it appears to be. Anyways 3960x, all 24 cores 48 threads @ 100%, if HWinfo is accurate,es Core + SOC power of 231.6w. Mining Monero. PB only for CPU. Using PBO it is easy to push 360w+ on the 3960x, for very little gain I might add to go with it.It's not precisely a 2:1 ratio for cores vs. power consumption. But, generally speaking AMD does give you double the cores (in some cases) as Intel at a similar power envelope.
Right, that is what it appears to be. Anyways 3960x, all 24 cores 48 threads @ 100%, if HWinfo is accurate,es Core + SOC power of 231.6w. Mining Monero. PB only for CPU. Using PBO it is easy to push 360w+ on the 3960x, for very little gain I might add to go with it.
Something is odd about that as the 11700K is about 5600, the all core boost is not that much higher to get 6800. That is probably a fixed max overclock score.The CPU Z benchmark numbers are alittle lower than I expected based on previous leaks.
ST 674
MT 6800
well the usb is through the pch not the cpu so is a z490 vs z590 difference on that oneAND!!! Let's not forget the 11th Gen has an integrated USB 3.2 controller, a "NEW" and more powerful GPU, whereas the other boards came with the horrible ASMedia controller and low tech GPU. And it's also a 14nm chip, not 7nm which Darkswordz doesn't know.
My 10700KF pulls 214w full load, no GPU, and yet, horrible ASMedia controller.
The original Kentsfield Core2Quads were two Conroe Core2Duo chips slapped together for the most part.My how the tables turned! Wasn't Intel the first to experiment with glueing chips together?
I think we only see non X ryzens if the KF and non K skus end up being any good.a perfect Intel launch, hype and false claims for 2 months with the internet bombarded by clickbait. on review day it is almost like rocket lake doesn't exist.
the 11600k is kind of at the FX8350 treatment of buy if you want cheap, though some places have a 5600x for around 300 dollars which is a good price for a 65 watt part that massacres the 600k and at times beats the 900k.
I don't see the value of a 5600 release with the 5600x already at 65w, a 5600xt 90w part could kick Intel's proverbial dead horse a little more.
pretty sad to see
My how the tables turned! Wasn't Intel the first to experiment with glueing chips together?
I think we only see non X ryzens if the KF and non K skus end up being any good.
I'd love if ryzens across the board started having iGPUs as an option. I love my 5600X, but sometimes I just wanna play something really simple and don't need the 1080ti for that.Unless the "plan" is to have APUs in the under $300 space.
I'd love if ryzens across the board started having iGPUs as an option. I love my 5600X, but sometimes I just wanna play something really simple and don't need the 1080ti for that.
Exactly. My brother just put together a new pc to play some older early-mid 2000 games on (he was lucky enough to get a 580 for $125 right before the attack of the miners). As much as I wanted to recommend a Ryzen, they just didn't have anything interesting. Same old 3200/3400. He instead went super budget with a 10100F.The APUs really need to get from "releasing" to "released" already. There hasn't been a non-OEM APU since the 3400G.
If you really want the 8 core, why not just get the 11700k then if you're already considering not going with the 11900k? It's at least less of a joke.Still have an 11900K coming from BBY (they have some kind of delay) but tempted to just get an 11600K. I'm stuck on Z490 and want the latest gen for PCIE4 and playing around with new stuff. It's a WC build too so I can handle hot and heavy.
Honestly? I’m the problem. It’s “not the best”. Heh.If you really want the 8 core, why not just get the 11700k then if you're already considering not going with the 11900k? It's at least less of a joke.
you can always get a 5800x, then you'll have the best, solving all problemsHonestly? I’m the problem. It’s “not the best”. Heh.
Plus, I have a feeling that all the boost stuff won’t ever work well for Z490 so I’d like to be a guinea pig as part of that journey lol. Gonna complain here!