Search results

$800 vs. $1800.

AI will replace you Jensen congrats you played yourself.

Upscale then downscale that's the key to best image quality.

Now look up market share.

I think at this point AMD has no choice but to "game works" their titles. AMD has tried for how long to be a good corporate citizen and push open standards. Where did it get them?

Not even Intel could kill x86. RIP Itanic.

Not really, I just wanted to make a stupid post. :ROFLMAO:

This is [H]ardOCP not [W]impyOEMOCP.

That's a tough one. Jensen would not accept anything but being top dog so he'd be running the company. Is he better than Lisa Su? I say no.

Not really the same, Nvidia already had fundamental GPU tech AMD didn't. AMD gets a whole lot of crap for over paying for ATI, yes they did but long term it was a great acquisition. IIRC Intel paid more for McAfee than AMD did for ATI.

The answer to this is quite simple, AMD bought ATI before Intel had a chance to.

Can you post a full sized image from both encoders so they can be directly compared?

Some people are stuck in the past, where AMD GPUs suck and their CPUs will "never" catch up to Intel.

I still get mine every time I post this.

For reference I tested 3 new Sony CMOS batteries the average was 3.254 volts. As for load from the motherboard it is nearly zero that's why a CMOS battery can last 15 years.

WHERE IS THE PORKTIUM 10GHZ PARTY????? That's what I thought still waiting.

That cooler already has all you need to connect the pump and fans to the ARGB port on your mobo http://www.gamerstorm.com/download/pdf/CASTLE_360EX.pdf For more ARGB ports get the splitter you linked to or get a simple ARGB splitter cable. The board you linked to will work all it does is feed...

From what I've read this board has a very high failure rate something like 1 out of 5. Other X570 GigaByte boards have been flaky as well or outright die including one I had the Aorus Wifi it was okay at first except had a cold boot problem. After a few days the board wouldn't post at all. RMA'd...

Some people like to watch the world burn.

Is it just me or does AdoredTV have the ability to talk for 30 minutes you still learn almost nothing.

I can't recall a CPU that so consistently hits a wall at specific clocks, which in this case is 4Ghz.

I think this go round Intel talking shit about AMD and trying to strong arm reviewers will backfire.

Looks like Intel has nothing to worry about, crisis averted.

All of them?

Of course it was sarcasm. Point being don't under estimate AMD, also I don't care about DX11 at all the best engines going forward are going to be DX12/Vulkan.

Same for their processor division, way too small to ever make competitive products.

I want to believe. My wallet says I do, brain says reality never matches hype.

Believe nothing until proper reviews hit. Myself I find it very difficult to believe a $500 product is beating a $1500+ one, that almost never happens generational shifts or not.

Compare initial shipments to years of sales, sure why not. Maybe, but Intel is hooked on high margins.

Tired of Intel dribbling out performance improvements, I don't even need a new system but I'm replacing Intel in my main rig.

This is relevant to my interests.

P4 4eva

Are you trying to say that a GPU with staying power is a bad thing somehow?

GF has a long long history of a new process being craptastic to start then steadily improves to the point of being downright excellent.

Wait, so only the fastest card ever is worth talking about. Okay.

So you're saying if a Polaris equipped card is reviewed in the proper context it could also get a Gold award. But by all means expect a tiny GPU to compete with the likes of the 1080 makes perfect sense because 14nm and 16nm.

You might want to think about this for a bit. Take your time.

How is it on a tech forum some of you don't know the difference between an architecture and a specific SKU? "Polaris can't beat Pascal" a tiny bit more granularity is needed for that to have any meaning.

Counter Pascal? Which Pascal based GPU?