Recent content by Vengeance

So a very specific request: Can anyone get a 3440x1440 HD wallpaper of a 2016 C7 Corvette ZO6 preferably in red? I just got to drive one for a day, after renting it in Las Vegas, and I must say I'm inspired to own one. Just need a nice shot for the desktop background to stay inspired, and...

Oh please, give me, give me, give me!! -V

1.) I'd Use It 2.) Phenom Thanks, -V

Yes, it was with the Renamed .exe. Remember this was IN GAME and I used FRAPS to record. Very interesting/crappy about going up to 4GB or RAM. I'm gonna try taking two sticks out of my box. I have to get to my band practice right now, but when I get back, I'll check it out and let you know...

Damn... Get this... I'm actually running: 1650x1080 All graphics set to Very High, (Except Shaders: Med) No AA/AF I get 38 Average FPS in game. Not bad! Looks pretty good! -V

Well... Damn... I just feel bad now, maybe I shouldn't have pointed it out? lol. Anyway, at least we're still getting good Average FPS. I actually have my Resolution set to 1680x1050 all effects on High, and I get around 32 FPS Average in game. -V

By the way Atech, How do you like the Asus PhysX P1? Does it make a big difference? -V

Hey, I didn't mean to cause offense to anyone. I'm running a GTX here, and I could care less about the subject of Nvidia "cheating" or not. I know like I said before, it's more about quality for me then the few extra FPS. If you notice in most of my post I quoted, "Bug / Cheat", what ever...

Hmmm... Sucks about the XP thing, because I'm definitely on to Vista for good. I'm hooked. As for the driver thing... Nvidia seems to have "cheated" when it comes to the water reflections on the new drivers. The best way to see what I'm talking about is if you look at the water...

I still don't understand how you got these numbers!

Ok, so I've finally got time to sit back and write this all out. Sorry it took so long, I got back to my office, and all hell broke loose on me.... First off, it appears there are many, many variables to consider here when running this bench mark across the various rigs here. Just a few...

I think you're totally right Tissue. But I found something really interesting just now, sadly I have to get into my office so I don't have time to post about it. I will however post up from my office, so give me about an hour, and I should be able to shed some light on this. -V

I'll take your advise, I'm gonna try OC'ing a lil and see what it gets me. I have to admit, I was really surprised the drivers alone netted me 7-8 FPS. I know there is a bug with the reflections, so I renamed the exe. Question, what should I try overclocking to? I came from a ATI 1950PRO...

Good point, and I agree. Anyway, the point of my post was to answer the original question if one of the rad's "could" be passive. From my experience the answer is yes. I have plenty of cooling, with room to OC more if I get the desire. It would probably be good to point out, I keep my...

....errrr... nevermind... 169.04 Drivers... ============================================================== TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 51.63s, Average FPS: 38.74 Min FPS: 29.89 at frame 1976, Max FPS...