Recent content by lolfail9001

In my shill opinion, that is hardly a big deal. CFL was already announced, wasn't it? As such, anyone who would look in direction of KBL right now would simply wait a month until CFL is out.

If only they have used identical panels... Otherwise that blindtest leaves sour impression.

Well, trick here is that it learned to do it on it's own. Update: people figured out that you can just confuse it. I wonder how long until people understand that even with deep learning, quick adaptation is not AI's strong point.

All of these report perceived correlation, don't they? Emphasis on "perceived".

There are like 3 x299 Aorus boards, which one do you mean? The Aorus 9 which is $500 even in Z270 version? Uhm, 583 is overclocked result itself, and i would not expect more than 100Mhz from TR compared to Kyle's sample.

Dunno, mate, those compile tests i have seen were nothing to write home about compared to 7900X. ECC support tips it in TR's favor though (unless it starts segfaulting lul).

To be honest, i got a little bit bored reading reviews, it basically performed as i have expected it to. Am glad to know that platform was nailed perfectly this time.

We also both know that you have no fucking clue of what you are talking about because you were too lazy to click on article i am referencing. I can excuse a journalist being sloppier than a bad student, but someone who talks of academic credentials really should not be nearly as shameless as to...

Thanks, Cap. Obvious, i knew that. But did you even look at article i am referring to?

Quite the opposite, i am getting right into my element, because you got so hung up on myself making fun of that silly review that you have claimed that it was not quantitative. Since i cannot read it, i presume you did, and it really is not quantitative. In which case... well, half of that...

It is research done by people who do not have resources to pull off a proper research in a scientific field. Because that's what it is, note how i only refer to a single study like that.

I've reworded it better, but anyways, treat it as personal note. Know thy opponent. As for cancer in question, it was well described in that memo if you pay attention. Get to the topic, man. Oh, so you have decided to simply avoid addressing my question altogether. That's kind of sad, really...

I actually disagree with the way he excuses himself in every other paragraph, because my opinion is that if you are going to bring up tough topics, you are supposed to bring them up straight up and tough, so you could say it is offensively inoffensive for me. For that matter, you are not...

How many of these people actually expressed their opinion beyond answering an anonymous survey? And if we're going by a stray interview or two then these interviews do state that they have to keep their opinions to themselves. Also, that is as inoffensive way of expressing your opinion publicly...

[citations, please] Man, the whole topic here is that there is no diversity of opinion and knowledge in those so-called "diverse" organizations. You either agree with the company bias or you get fired, and you have no issues with that at all.