Nice. A word for word rehash of the *exact* rebuttal from every corrupt gaming "journalist" on earth - if you like attractive characters in games, you just want porn in your game. So original
More realistic than the *actual* model ??? Nonsense. It is absolutely an attempt to make a game more "accessible" so the mythical (ie non-existent) female gamer won't be offended by the character being designed for the male gaze. This is not a conspiracy, its just a simple fact.
Still $20 as far as I can tell. Looks pretty good, so I picked it up this morning before it goes up. Looks like the release date for version 1.0 is May 8th, with the price hike set for April 5th. You still have a couple days.
See, this is what really bugs me about this. The VAST majority of people have no interest in this, from both the staunch conservative to the hard line left. Nevermind the middle that doesn't care about any of this crap. Its unbelievable that this is all portrayed like the most important issue...
Well, that and women's bathrooms, locker rooms, rape crisis centers and safe houses should not sacrifice the safety of non-trans-women on the altar of "trans rights". I think most people tend to agree with all that. She even started a NEW rape crisis center for biological women only and...
Dang, I had started writing a response, but must have moved on to other things....
So my journey as a PG gamer started in the early 80s on a Commodore 64 playing original Wolfenstein, Microleague Baseball, Zork, and Montezuma's revenge.
Had to get an IBM PS2 for college in 1987, so on that...
I think you're right, but the mechanic in that one was infinitely better than this. And even still, it was tolerable, but it was a chore. Racing and drifting are not the same thing. Make a drifting game and see how many people buy it. I doubt very many
This I do not dispute at all. But then, I'm not sure I'd agree ANY game is. Luckily, EA Play has it, and since I already paid for that, its basically free