Recent content by Sancus

no lol Bought one, actually I own 2 OLEDs one of which is 5 years old(LG TV) and neither have any burn-in. My alienware has 12+ hours a day on it for close to 2 years now(received early May 2022) and still nothing. Sorry to disappoint. There's always risk but in my book "oh no my $900 monitor...

LCDs have always gotten brighter than competing technologies that offer better contrast. That's not anything new. And yes, it sells TVs in the stores. That isn't new. The problem is always that going brighter is impressive, but if you're elevating the black levels in the surrounding area at the...

I think they're just tired of having their flagship being fundamentally a product made by another manufacturer. Both in terms of PR and margins. If they give up on OLED completely it'll be a bit sad that we can't get QD-OLED with Dolby Vision anymore. There is no indication whatsoever they've...

yep, that's how I got my number

I have just over 6000 hours on mine and there's no burn-in at all, only posted grey but I checked every color. I'm not gentle with the monitor either, I don't hide the taskbar and I use it 10-12 hours per day for work in addition to gaming, youtube, etc. I do have eco mode off so I get more...

250 nits should be more than enough unless there's a lot of external light in the room, like brighter than a typical LED lit office building.

TFTCentral is talking about panel release dates though, not display. If panels are ready in Q3 2024 as predicted, it's unlikely products will be out until well into 2025 at the earliest, and if that's delayed even a little bit 2026 is more likely.

Ive been using my Alienware AW3423DW for 9 months now with no signs of burn-in. Brightness is 50%(can't imagine why anyone would want to use more than that). I treat it as a normal monitor, and use it probably 10-12 hours a day. I do not hide my taskbar. The only concession I've made to it...

Did you even read the thread? it's not a product it's a prototype and it's not even 4K. And you can bet the first one that IS 4K and a product will be *far* more than $3000 lol.

Haha, well, if the 50" is 4K even as a proof of concept that still means they CAN do it, which is a step. I would guess they're not products because the yields are too poor or the prices would have to be 10s of thousands higher than the bigger models which would make them unmarketable.

Yes, I would like to see the pricing as it will give us an idea of what the trend to "affordable" is going to look like. It's odd that they are trumpeting the 76" as "smallest and most affordable" with two smaller models in the lineup. I suspect that means there's something "wrong" with the...

$10K+ I'd guess. They're not saying how much the new ones will cost yet which always means 'lol way too much'.

HDR isn't about eye-searing brightness though, it's about contrast. Obviously if you side-by-side a blown-out FALD next to an OLED, the FALD is going to look more impactful. Your eyes are going to be adjusted for the brighter display. But the actual contrast is worse. There's really no point to...

Neither of those numbers are anywhere near correct. The problem with LCDs is their response times are heavily inconsistent, and vary widely depending on what color they transition to and from. Even fast 240hz ones typically have >10ms response times for some colors. This will produce awful...

My monitor has 0 burn-in (checked on full screen grey, yellow, and red, not on content like some kind of idiot...) and I've been using it with 0 precautions for 4.5 months. I don't hide the taskbar, and I do work 8-10 hours per day plus some gaming and other stuff, probably 10-12 hours a day...