Recent content by kasakka

My take on the whole glossy vs matte is that I don't care as long as matte coating is not the awfully grainy type seen on some displays. I don't mind the one on my dual Samsung G70A 4K 28" IPS displays. All the other stuff are going to be more issues, but going back to 60 Hz is a tough one. If...

Absolutely. 8K would be better off marketed and designed for e.g programmers, stock traders, people managing a ton of different Excels and so on who need a lot of desktop space for work, and would probably pay for the right product, say a 55-65" Samsung ARK 8K. Instead they push it for "rich...

Scaled Resolution Editor is the best option for anything that uses DSC.

I would expect the 5000 series to silently upgrade the HDMI capabilities to match the 7900 XTX, maybe with a full speed DP 2.1 port unless Nvidia decides to nickel and dime us again. I expect the answer to the second question is no. Samsung is unlikely to have the incentive to support above 8K...

Seems like a typical bullshit review with nothing but subjective opinions almost parroting marketing material.

Yeah I'd probably just try running the pixel refresher manually and hopefully it will get rid of current burn-in instead of waiting for it to have lingered there for longer. Extra 1000h is quite a bit of time after all.

I'd go with #3. We might get 45" 5120x2160 OLEDs in early to mid 2025, so that would solve the PPI issue at least.

I think that mainly says something about how good the CX series was and how disappointing the updates to these have been in the past few years.

That's nearly two years of on time for the display. I think I checked mine after 3 years and it was like half of that. I would just turn the TV off from the remote when taking a longer break so it would run its compensation cycles if needed. I'd need to check where mine is set for SDR OLED...

That might be the best way to go about it. It will be more blurry of course but should give you some idea.

Unless you are using the 57" purely as a gaming monitor, I'd hate to lose that much pixel density. It's the same height as the 57" but much lower res. Remember that DLSS is also dependent on your native res, so DLSS Quality at 4K (or its ultrawide variants) is higher base res than DLSS Quality...

Yeah a lot of nonsense especially in phones. I currently use a Samsung Galaxy Fold 4, and it's a really chunky phone when folded, but it feels fine to hold in your hand because it's quite narrow physically, no wider than an iPhone 12 Mini, just much taller. Phones have gone to complete nonsense...

Probably because it's cheaper to make and ship because it takes less space and weighs less. We have this insane trend of displays, phones and laptops being very thin for no good reason. If you look at reference monitors, they are thick bastards with fans etc. Give me that but in a consumer...

To me it's just headroom. I'm currently playing Like A Dragon Infinite Wealth and on my 4090 that runs at 4K 120 fps with Nvidia DLAA. I could probably push it quite a bit further with DLSS and FG but what's the point if your display can't show those frames? To be fair for anything but the most...

IMO people were complaining way more about the QD-OLED pixel structure issues than anything on the WOLED TVs. At a more appropriate viewing distance of 1+ m scaling becomes even more important.