If I remember correctly, Nvidia will show double bandwidth in the UI, but when it actually displays the resolution, it will output the correct (meaning half) bandwidth
So it does have the DVI-I layout? Some of the pictures I've seen had the DVI-D layout instead
Definitely takes some pictures if you open it up. I'm guessing the analog pins aren't soldered.
Would be really nice if we could find a datasheet for this chip
Ok so I think I have a big update on this.
Way back when I first tried this adapter, I had to run DP to a Sunix DP-Alt USB-C card. I had some random lines going through the screen, and my max pixel clock sucked. My best guess is there is some incompatibility with the Sunix Alt-DP card, thought...
Easa you should be asking those quesions after you do a WinDAS adjustment, not before.
Because the adjustment might fix most of those problems. Especially the green tint.
There's like 30 OLED monitors coming out this year.
I don't know if it will be a good idea to have a separate thread for each one.
Maybe it'll be better to have a thread for each type: 4k, 1440p, ultrawide, double ultrawide
I don't know if this is true. If you right click on youtube videos and click "stats for nerds" you'll see a lot of them are 24fps.
And if you really want your OCD escalated, right click on videos produced in Europe
Are you using one Picture Mode globally or something? Because the Gigabyte has like 8 different picture modes to choose from and you can edit gamma and brightness in all of them
Ok, so you're saying you still notice the texture of the screen?
I'm just curious because I've never seen one in person (I have the glossy Gigabyte FO48U)
Seems like any sort of noticeable texture could be a problem given the very tiny pixel pitch of 4k
Only 600+ MHz DAC I know of is the one built into analog AMD GPUs. You can unlock past 400MHz with Toasty X's pixel clock patcher.
There may be an external DAC out there that beats the Sunix but nobody's discovered it yet. To my knowledge