![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Majin said:
I played the PC version of the game in glorious four-colour CGA! I admit I did play it a lot, though in retrospect, I am not sure why. As I've stated before, I am easily amused, much to the thanks of my parents.banGerprawN said:Aww, man! Spy VS Spy! For the Sega Master System II. Ahaha. God-DAMN, I remember that game well. I played it when I was like, 8 or something. Christ. I can't comment on how good it was/wasn't, as I haven't played it for quite some time, but I do remember it kept my attention. There must have been something about it....
The last I checked, the reasons we play games are to escape reality. I am no expert, but I imagine most people are not educated enough about Samurais(sp) to know how their way of life was. If you want to nitpick, I am sure that there are thousands of games that contradict things, even things that they are founded upon.LoneWolf said:
I thought the Duke3D vs. Quake debate ended years ago with a tie. People liked either game for different reasons. Personally, I have never finished Quake, even though I bought it, because it simply became too boring. Duke Nukem had levels that you could relate to, like dirty cities, but it also had a lot of neat 'what if' scenarios, like space stations. To me, it was a matter of Dukem Nukem doing a lot of things well, whereas Quake did only one thing great: the engine. But the rest of the game was lacking, I found.TheAcorn said:
I remember that! Or the sticky bomb, with all of the random quotes when you hit someone with it! "Sticky bomb stick to Mister Stupid!" "Sticky bomb LIKE you!" etc.Majin said:
It was great to see the enemies run around with these spiked grenades stuck to them! Boar-Ral said:
Definitely! The fact that it was a true 3D engine spoke volumes. For me, the big draw to Duke Nukem was the humour - I am just that sort of person, whereas I found Quake to be too serious. Not really a fault, and that is what we've found in the past in this thread - a lot of people are listing games here that they just aren't too keen on, but it would be unfair to call them the worst ever. Duke Nukem Forever, on the other hand, I can see being here. (And someone already listed it.) It truly is a disappointment. The very fact that it is not finished after all these years speaks volumes more than even a horrible release can. I keep my fingers crossed, because I've been a Duke Nukem fan for ages, but I am losing what little faith and confidence I had left.hikeskool said:
I must have more faith in the Command & Conquer series, because I still play Generals. Though this might be partially due to the extreme difficulty I have getting the older C&C games to work on my current system, and due to consolidating my PCs, I only have one - no legacy box for me. Generals is a staple at the LAN parties I attend, most of the time.JRPereira said:
Boar-Ral said:Definitely! The fact that it was a true 3D engine spoke volumes. For me, the big draw to Duke Nukem was the humour - I am just that sort of person, whereas I found Quake to be too serious. Not really a fault, and that is what we've found in the past in this thread - a lot of people are listing games here that they just aren't too keen on, but it would be unfair to call them the worst ever. Duke Nukem Forever, on the other hand, I can see being here. (And someone already listed it.) It truly is a disappointment. The very fact that it is not finished after all these years speaks volumes more than even a horrible release can. I keep my fingers crossed, because I've been a Duke Nukem fan for ages, but I am losing what little faith and confidence I had left.
That DOES look pretty incredible. I really hope that the final product is close to what we see in the movie. Duke Nukem Forever had two nice E3 movies, but look at where it stands at the moment. There are a lot of neat innovations that I can in Prey from the movie, though, and that will make it stand out a lot. At the end of the day, Duke Nukem Forever is just a shooter.hikeskool said:
ESO was actually really good in beta and early launch. They dumbed it down big time when they switched to buy to play from sub only (One Tamriel), never fixed pvp latency, and kept making things for the cash shop to address design flaws that should have been fixed instead. It's a shame because it was basically DAOC 2 at launch.
I liked shenmue
Looks like you missed one of my recent ones:
wat? are you sad/mad you didnt make the top ten? thats also your first post in here...
I only put around 3-4 hours into it, never finished it. Just because you can enjoy one piece of a game before it gets old doesn't mean the game can't be your worst game ever played.
Typically, bad games are pretty bad from the start with most aspects of the game sucking.
